Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on IPC Section 114. Abettor present when offence is committed

Bare Act Title Category / State
IPC Section 114. Abettor present when offence is committed Criminal Laws
 

List of Judgements

SATISH CHANDER AHUJA vs. SNEHA AHUJA

Judgement Date : october/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 561 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALDomestic Violence Act - Shared Household - Definition - A shared household does not refer to the household of a joint family of which the husband is a member or in which the husband of the aggrieved person has a share.CRUCIALThe residence of a woman in a household must indicate a degree of pe...

MUSTAK @ KANIO AHMED SHAIKH vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : june/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 406 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Sections 307 and 114, along with Section 25(1)(B)(a) of the Arms Act of 1959, and Section 135(1) of the Bombay Police Act of 1861, as well as Section 157 of the Criminal Procedure Code of 1973, pertain to the crime of Attempted Murder. In this case, the co...

SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMU vs. STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

Judgement Date : june/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 384 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALIn cases of abduction followed by murder, there is a presumption that the abductor is also the murderer.Abetment is a substantive offense, and the punishment for it varies based on different circumstances.There is a discrepancy between Sections 114 and 133; thus, it would be unwise to convict...

SATISHKUMAR NYALCHAND SHAH vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : march/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 214 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTCriminal Procedure - Further Investigation - Proposed Accused Not Required to Be Heard.According to the Criminal Procedure Code of 1973, specifically Section 173(8) and 156(3), as well as the Gujarat Ownership of Flats Act and violations of the Gujarat Development Control Regulations (GDCR)...

SHRI PARESHBHAI AMRUTLAL PATEL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : february/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 205 SC

Headnote :

The Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Sections 420, 406, 120B, and 114, pertains to the quashing of an FIR. The appellant had previously filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the private respondent. Subsequently, the respondent filed an FIR against the a...

RAJESHBHAI MULJIBHAI PATEL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : february/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 133 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTWhile the opinion of a handwriting expert is a relevant piece of evidence, an FIR cannot be registered solely based on that opinion.A. Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, and 114 - Forgery - Quashing of FIR - The complainant alleged that the appellants conspired t...

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH vs. AMAN MITTAL

Judgement Date : september/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 805 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTNo individual can be prosecuted for offenses related to weight or measure under Chapter XIII of the IPC due to the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act.IMPORTANTThe High Court, when exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code, cannot intervene in the investigation process.A....

Bharatbhai Bhimabhai Bharwad v. State of Gujarat

Judgement Date : july/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 613 SC

Headnote :

The Criminal Procedure Code of 1973, Section 439(2), and the Indian Penal Code of 1860, Sections 323, 324, 326, 307, 504, and 506(2) address the cancellation of bail due to a breach of conditions. The criteria for canceling bail differ from those for contesting the initial grant of bail based on arb...

Kalabai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Judgement Date : april/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 441 SC

Savitaben Vs. State of Gujarat

Judgement Date : march/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 253 SC

VIDYALAKSHMI @ VIDYA & ORS Vs STATE OF KERALA

Judgement Date : february/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 133 SC

Headnote :

The Supreme Court, referencing the Indian Penal Code of 1860, specifically Sections 302, 120B, 114, 379, and 34, has determined that the prosecution has successfully demonstrated that Accused Nos. 1 and 2 were present at the scene of the crime, where Accused No. 3 and the victim were located, and wh...

Sanjiv Rajendra Bhatt Vs. Union of India & Ors. [October 13, 2015]

Judgement Date : october/2015, Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 691 SC

Bhanuben and ANR. Vs. State of Gujarat [September 14, 2015]

Judgement Date : september/2015, Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 603 SC

Amrutlal Liladharbhai Kotak & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat [February 26, 2015]

Judgement Date : february/2015, Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 153 SC

Ghusabhai Raisangbhai Chorasiya & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat [FEBRUARY 18, 2015]

Judgement Date : february/2015, Citation : 2015 Latest Caselaw 124 SC

Patel Maheshbhai Ranchodbhai and Others Vs. State of Gujarat [September 26, 2014]

Judgement Date : september/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 627 SC

State of NCT of Delhi Vs. Sanjay [September 04, 2014]

Judgement Date : september/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 546 SC

C.K. Dasegowda & Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka [July 15, 2014]

Judgement Date : july/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 449 SC

Pooja Abhishek Goyal Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors. [April 25, 2014]

Judgement Date : april/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 321 SC

Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki VS. State of Gujarat & Ors. [FEBRUARY 25, 2014]

Judgement Date : february/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 120 SC

Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal Vs. State of Gujarat [September 09, 2013]

Judgement Date : september/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 622 SC

Indrajit Suresh Prasad Bind & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat [MARCH 18, 2013]

Judgement Date : march/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 209 SC

Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar Vs. State of Gujarat [february 22, 2013]

Judgement Date : february/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 156 SC

Sunil Mehta & ANR. Vs. State of Gujarat & ANR. [february 20, 2013]

Judgement Date : february/2013, Citation : 2013 Latest Caselaw 150 SC

Shantibhai J. Vaghela and Anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. [November, 9 2012]

Judgement Date : november/2012, Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 643 SC

Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel Vs State of Gujarat & ANR. [April 23, 2012]

Judgement Date : april/2012, Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 240 SC

Jetha Bhaya Odedara Vs. Ganga Maldebhai Odedara and ANR.

Judgement Date : december/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 914 SC

Takdir Samsuddin Sheikh Vs. State of Gujarat & ANR

Judgement Date : october/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 794 SC

C. Muniappan & Ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu [2010] INSC 675 (30 August 2010)

Judgement Date : august/2010, Citation : 2010 Latest Caselaw 617 SC

Neelu Chopra & ANR. Vs. Bharti [2009] INSC 1632 (7 October 2009)

Judgement Date : october/2009, Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 821 SC

Chikkarangaiah & Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka [2009] INSC 1527 (2 September 2009)

Judgement Date : september/2009, Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 716 SC

Des Raj Vs. State of Punjab [2007] Insc 902 (7 September 2007)

Judgement Date : september/2007, Citation : 2007 Latest Caselaw 689 SC

Sidharth Vs. State of Bihar [2005] Insc 520 (30 September 2005)

Judgement Date : september/2005, Citation : 2005 Latest Caselaw 518 SC

James Martin Vs. State of Kerala [2003] INSC 647 (16 December 2003)

Judgement Date : december/2003, Citation : 2003 Latest Caselaw 639 SC

Atmendra Vs. The State of Karnataka [1998] INSC 193 (31 March 1998)

Judgement Date : march/1998, Citation : 1998 Latest Caselaw 193 SC

Purna Chandra Sen Gupta Vs. Supdt & Remembrancer of Legal Affairs [1993] INSC 415 (8 October 1993)

Judgement Date : october/1993, Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 409 SC

Headnote :

The Court\'s Judgment was presented by K. JAYACHANDRA REDDY, J. - These appeals are directed against the shared ruling of the High Court of Calcutta, which overturned the acquittal decision made by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate in Siliguri.

Abdul Razak Nannekhan Pathan Vs. Police Commissioner, Ahmadabad & ANR [1989] INSC 212 (27 July 1989)

Judgement Date : july/1989, Citation : 1989 Latest Caselaw 212 SC

Headnote :

In the current petition, the Petitioner contests the legality and validity of the detention order issued by the Respondent against him under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985. The detenu was arrested and placed in Sabarmati Central Jail on October 5, 1988. Fo...

Rama Dhondu Borade Vs. V.K. Saraf, Commissioner of Police & Ors [1989] INSC 183 (5 May 1989)

Judgement Date : may/1989, Citation : 1989 Latest Caselaw 183 SC

Headnote :

To prevent the petitioner-detenu from engaging in activities detrimental to public order in Greater Bombay, the Commissioner of Police, Greater Bombay, exercised the powers granted by Sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980, in conjunction with clause 4 of the National Securi...

Dharamdas Shamlal Agarwal Vs. Police Commissioner & ANR [1989] INSC 93 (16 March 1989)

Judgement Date : march/1989, Citation : 1989 Latest Caselaw 93 SC

Headnote :

The petitioner was detained based on an order issued on September 17, 1988, by the detaining authority under subsection (2) of section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985, aimed at preventing him from engaging in activities detrimental to public order. The grounds for his...

State of Karnataka Vs. Hemareddy Alias Vemareddy & ANR [1981] INSC 18 (27 January 1981)

Judgement Date : january/1981, Citation : 1981 Latest Caselaw 18 SC

Headnote :

Section 195(1)(b)(i) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 states that no court shall take cognizance of any offense punishable under the sections listed therein (including S. 193 I.P.C.) if the offense is alleged to have occurred in relation to any court proceeding, unless a written complaint is m...

Karnal Singh Uttam Singh Vs. State of Maharashtra [1975] INSC 282 (19 November 1975)

Judgement Date : november/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 280 SC

Headnote :

On March 4, 1968, the day of the incident, Karnal Singh, the accused, was operating truck No. MRS 7372. This truck was acquired through a loan from the ex-serviceman Co-operative Society by one Sutar, who then leased the vehicle to Balwant Singh, the appellant\'s brother and a co-accused, under a hi...

State of Gujarat Vs. Bai Fatima & ANR [1975] INSC 78 (19 March 1975)

Judgement Date : march/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 78 SC

Headnote :

Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 were a mother and daughter. The deceased was the brother-in-law of respondent No. 1. In the days leading up to the incident, tensions between the two families were quite strained. On the day of the incident, a confrontation occurred between the respondents and the deceased....

Ram Kumar Pande Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh [1975] INSC 29 (11 February 1975)

Judgement Date : february/1975, Citation : 1975 Latest Caselaw 29 SC

Headnote :

The appellant faced two charges: (i) one under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) concerning a single individual, and (ii) another under sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. for allegedly causing the death of another person in conjunction with other accused individuals. The trial court found him...

The State Gujarat Vs. Manshankar Prabhasankar Dwivedi [1972] INSC 122 (26 April 1972)

Judgement Date : april/1972, Citation : 1972 Latest Caselaw 122 SC

Headnote :

D, a lecturer at a government college, was appointed as an examiner for a physics practical exam conducted by Gujarat University. He allegedly accepted Rs. 500 from a candidate in exchange for favoritism. Consequently, he faced charges under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(2) in c...

Cricket Association of Bengal & Ors Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors [1971] INSC 92 (24 March 1971)

Judgement Date : march/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 92 SC

Headnote :

A complaint was lodged against the first appellant and other office bearers under Sections 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), read with Section 114, alleging that they acted recklessly and negligently in organizing seating arrangements for spectators at a cricket match. This negligence led...

Collector of Customs, New Delhi Vs. Ghulam Sarwar & Ors [1970] INSC 74 (24 March 1970)

Judgement Date : march/1970, Citation : 1970 Latest Caselaw 74 SC

Headnote :

The individual in question was a Pakistani national who was arrested on May 8, 1964. Following his arrest, he confessed to a Magistrate, revealing his involvement in two distinct conspiracies alongside various co-defendants. However, the customs authorities believed there was only one conspiracy and...

Dalpat Singh & ANR Vs. State of Rajasthan [1968] INSC 40 (13 February 1968)

Judgement Date : february/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 40 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a Havaldar, and the second appellant, a Subedar in the Rajasthan Armed Constabulary, were accused of extorting money from an individual by alleging that he was involved in black marketing and frequently traveling to Pakistan. They threatened that if he did not pay the demanded sum, he...

Mohan Lal Magan Lal Thacker Vs. State of Gujarat [1967] INSC 304 (15 December 1967)

Judgement Date : december/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 304 SC

Headnote :

Following an inquiry under section 476 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Judicial Magistrate in Baroda directed that the appellant be prosecuted for offenses under sections 205, 467, and 468 in conjunction with section 114 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon appeal, the Additional Sessions Judge aff...

Madanlal Vs. State of Punjab [1967] INSC 89 (5 April 1967)

Judgement Date : april/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 89 SC

Headnote :

J had authorized the appellant, a clerk working under him, to withdraw funds from the bank for payments to various individuals.Upon discovering that the funds had not been disbursed to the intended recipients, J filed a report. The appellant acknowledged withdrawing the funds but claimed he had give...

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Vishnu Ramchandra [1960] INSC 173 (18 October 1960)

Judgement Date : october/1960, Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 173 SC

Headnote :

On November 16, 1949, the respondent was found guilty under sections 380 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. Subsequently, on October 5, 1957, the Deputy Commissioner of Police in Bombay issued an order under section 57(1) of the Bombay Police Act, expelling him from the Greater Bombay area. He was la...

Asgarali Nazarali Singaporawalla Vs. The State of Bombay [1957] INSC 17 (19 February 1957)

Judgement Date : february/1957, Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 17 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, along with four others, was on trial before the Presidency Magistrate in Bombay for offenses under Section 161 in conjunction with Sections 116, 109, or 114 of the Indian Penal Code. While the trial was ongoing, the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 1952 (XLVI of 1952) was enacted by Parl...

Nasar Ali Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [1957] INSC 15 (14 February 1957)

Judgement Date : february/1957, Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 15 SC

Headnote :

A first information report (FIR) is not considered a substantial piece of evidence; it can only be used to support the statement of the person who made it under Section 157 of the Evidence Act or to challenge it under Section 145 of the same Act. It cannot serve as evidence against the maker if they...

Shreekantiah Ramayya Munipalli Vs. The State of Bombay [1954] INSC 126 (22 December 1954)

Judgement Date : december/1954, Citation : 1954 Latest Caselaw 126 SC

Headnote :

The three accused, who were government employees, faced joint charges for an offense punishable under section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. Additionally, they were charged together with committing a breach of trust in furtherance of their common intention under section 409 of the I...