Wednesday, 29, Apr, 2026
 
Torrent Pharma ADVT
latestlaws android app
latestlaws iOS app
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
trademarkclick
 
  
  
 
 
2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950
January February March April May June July August September October November December
 
Workmen of M/S. Delhi Cloth and General Mills Vs. Management of M/S. Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd. [1969] INSC 301 (17 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 17 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 301 SC

Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

In the conciliation proceedings led by the Conciliation Officer, the D.C.M. (City Shop) Karamchari Union represented the worker Shibban Lal. On June 18, 1965, the Conciliation Officer submitted a failure report to the Government. However, a settlement had already been reached between the Union and t...
Read full Judgement
Ghulam Nabi Zaki Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir [1969] INSC 302 (27 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 27 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 302 SC

Preventive Detention Act, 1950

Headnote :

The petitioner was taken into custody on November 9, 1968, following an order issued on August 23, 1968, under section 3(1)(a) of the Jammu and Kashmir Preventive Detention Act, 1964. While the petitioner was still detained, the order was revoked on August 20, 1969, and a new detention order was iss...
Read full Judgement
Munshi Lal Beni Ram Glass Works Vs. S. R. Singh, Assistant Labour Commissioner & Ors [1969] INSC 303 (27 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 27 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 303 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

The State Government, claiming to act under sections 3, 4, and 8 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1944, referred a dispute from the appellant\'s factory to an adjudicator, who issued his award on December 31, 1957. On January 28, 1958, the Government issued an order enforcing the Award, based on...
Read full Judgement
Meharbansingh & Ors Vs. Nareshsingh & Ors [1969] INSC 304 (27 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 27 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 304 SC

Gwalior

Headnote :

The appellant initiated a lawsuit seeking to redeem a mortgage.The lower courts ruled in favor of the suit. The High Court determined that, according to the provisions of the Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act XIII of 1951, the appellants had the right to redeem the mortgage but were not entitled...
Read full Judgement
State of Punjab Vs. Sardar Sewa Singh Gill & Ors [1969] INSC 305 (27 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 27 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 305 SC

Headnote :

Respondent No. 1 was allocated a parcel of land in Patiala State in 1946 to facilitate the establishment of a company for the production of Banaspatighee. After covering the land costs, possession was granted to respondent No. 1 on November 17, 1946. Subsequently, on February 12, 1947, a promoting c...
Read full Judgement
Tatanagar Foundry Co. Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen [1969] INSC 306 (27 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 27 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 306 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

The appellant notified the respondents, its employees, about its decision to shut down the business. The reasons for this closure included: (i) the appellant\'s financial situation, (ii) a lack of orders for goods, and (iii) the respondents\' lack of cooperation in certain matters. The question of w...
Read full Judgement
Navalkha & Sons Vs. Sri Ramanya Das & Ors [1969] INSC 307 (27 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 27 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 307 SC

Headnote :

In the liquidation proceedings of a company, the official liquidator and a shareholder requested the High Court\'s permission to sell the company\'s movable and immovable properties, as well as actionable claims. The company judge appointed commissioners to oversee the sale, stipulating that the sal...
Read full Judgement
Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills & Ors Vs. Tata Air-Craft Ltd. [1969] INSC 308 (28 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 308 SC

Section 74. Compensation of breach of contract where penalty stipulated for

Headnote :

The respondent consented to sell, and the appellant consented to purchase some aero-scrap for Rs. 10,00,000. On the date of the contract, the appellant paid Rs. 2,50,000, and it was agreed that the remaining balance would be paid in two installments. Additionally, it was agreed that the respondent\'...
Read full Judgement
A.K. K. Nambiar Vs. Union of India & ANR [1969] INSC 309 (28 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 309 SC

CrPC Section 154. Information in cognizable cases
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946

Headnote :

The appellant joined the Indian Police Service in 1935. In November 1956, he was appointed as the Inspector-General of Police in Andhra Pradesh, and in August 1967, he became the Special Inspector-General of Police tasked with revising the Police Standing Orders. That same year, the Chief Minister o...
Read full Judgement
Sudhir Kumar & Ors Vs. Baldev Krishna Thapar & Ors [1969] INSC 310 (28 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 310 SC

Headnote :

One of the provisions of the lease for a cinema was that upon its expiration, the lessee had the option to renew the lease with the lessor\'s consent. After the lease term ended, the lessor initiated an ejectment lawsuit but passed away while the case was ongoing. On December 23, 1958, the lawsuit w...
Read full Judgement
Rajah Velugoti Kumara Krishna Yachendravaru & Ors Vs. Rajah Velugoti Sarvagna Kumara Krishnayachendra Varu & Ors [1969] INSC 311 (28 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 311 SC

Headnote :

The appellants initiated a lawsuit for partition, asserting their entitlement to a share in specific properties of the Venkatagiri Estate that were not transferred to the State under the Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act of 1948. Alternatively, they sought maintenance based...
Read full Judgement
V/O Tractor Export, Moscow Vs. M/S. Tarapore & Company & ANR [1969] INSC 312 (28 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 312 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

According to Article 2 of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958, which India is a signatory to, each contracting State has agreed to acknowledge a written agreement in which the parties commit to resolve their disputes through arbitration. Furthe...
Read full Judgement
Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India [1969] INSC 313 (28 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 313 SC

Headnote :

The appellant company initiated legal action against the Union of India seeking payment at an increased rate beyond the basic rate specified in a construction contract with the Union. The claim was based on the need to revise rates due to the intricate nature and increased volume of work, as well as...
Read full Judgement
Travancore Rayon Ltd. Vs. Union of India [1969] INSC 314 (28 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 28 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 314 SC

Headnote :

The appellant company was subjected to excise duty for the use of \"nitro-cellulose lacquer\" that it manufactured.The company contested the classification of the chemical compound it produced and used, arguing that it did not qualify as \"nitrocellulose lacquer\" as defined by the Central Excise an...
Read full Judgement
State of Bihar Vs. K. K. Misra & Ors [1969] INSC 315 (29 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 29 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 315 SC

Constitution of India
CrPC Section 439. Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail

Babulal Parate Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors [1961] INSC 10 (12 January 1961)

Headnote :

Sub-section (6) of Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure states that no order issued under Section 144 shall remain effective for more than two months from its issuance, unless the State Government directs otherwise through a notification in the Official Gazette in cases where there is a thr...
Read full Judgement
Shankar Prahlad Deshpande & Ors Vs. Seth Gendalal Motilal Patni & Ors [1969] INSC 316 (29 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 29 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 316 SC

Headnote :

A mortgagor submitted an application to the Claims Officer under section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals and Alienated Lands) Act 1 of 1951, seeking a determination of the debt owed to the mortgagee and a reduction of that debt. The mortgagee argued that the...
Read full Judgement
Narayanibai Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors [1969] INSC 317 (29 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 29 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 317 SC

Headnote :

The petitioner was required to explain why the land she held beyond the ceiling limit should not be classified as surplus land and consequently transferred to the State under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceilings on Holdings) Act, 1961. In response, the petitioner contested the constitutional...
Read full Judgement
Coffee Board, Bangalore Vs. Joint Commercial Tax Officer, Madras & ANR [1969] INSC 318 (29 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 29 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 318 SC

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956
Coffee Act, 1942
Constitution of India

Headnote :

According to Article 286(1)(b) of the Constitution, sales tax exemptions are provided for the sale or purchase of goods that occur during the importation into or exportation out of India.Following the 6th Amendment to the Constitution, Parliament enacted the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, which specif...
Read full Judgement
Choudhry Jawaharlal & Ors Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1969] INSC 319 (30 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 30 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 319 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Constitution of India

Headnote :

The appellants built several public structures in a princely state, and the Maharaja acknowledged their claim by signing a promissory note for the claimed amount. Following the merger of the princely state with Madhya Pradesh, the State Government (respondent) assumed control of the public buildings...
Read full Judgement
State of Haryana Vs. Mohan Lal & Ors [1969] INSC 320 (30 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 30 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 320 SC

Punjab Municipal Act, 1911

Headnote :

In August 1954, the Rohtak Municipal Committee was dissolved, and an Administrator was appointed in accordance with section 238 of the Punjab Municipal Act of 1911. By June 1958, the provisions of the Punjab Town Improvement Act of 1922 were applied to the Municipality, leading to the establishment...
Read full Judgement
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Satya Narain Prasad [1969] INSC 321 (30 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 30 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 321 SC

Northern India Ferries Act, 1878
Northern India Ferries Act, 1878

Headnote :

The respondent was awarded a lease for a public ferry by the State of Uttar Pradesh for a duration of three years.According to section 10 of the Northern India Ferries Act, 1878, the State Government had the authority to terminate such a lease after providing six months\' written notice to the lesse...
Read full Judgement
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Satya Narain Prasad [1969] INSC 321 (30 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 30 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 322 SC

Northern India Ferries Act, 1878
Northern India Ferries Act, 1878

Headnote :

The respondent was awarded a lease for a public ferry by the State of Uttar Pradesh for a duration of three years.According to section 10 of the Northern India Ferries Act, 1878, the State Government had the authority to terminate such a lease after providing six months\' written notice to the lesse...
Read full Judgement
Jai Chand Sawhney Vs. Union of India [1969] INSC 322 (31 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 31 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 323 SC

Government of India Act, 1935

Headnote :

The appellant, who worked for the railway, was terminated from his position on October 13, 1949. On October 13, 1955, he initiated a lawsuit against the respondent to overturn the dismissal order and to claim unpaid salary. The dismissal was annulled due to the failure to provide the constitutional...
Read full Judgement
Kidar Nath Vs. Mangat Rai & Ors [1969] INSC 323 (31 October 1969)

Judgement Date : 31 Oct 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 324 SC

Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934
Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934
Punjab Relief of Indebtedness Act, 1934
Punjab Restitution of Mortgaged Lands Act, 1938
Punjab Restitution of Mortgaged Lands Act, 1938
Usurious Loans Act, 1918

Headnote :

In a case concerning the redemption of a mortgage with possession under a mortgage deed from 1896, the Court determined the outstanding amount owed on the mortgages. The mortgagor did not make any payments as ordered by the decree. Following his death, his representatives sought relief under section...
Read full Judgement
Jayanarayan Sukul Vs. State of West Bengal [1969] INSC 324 (5 November 1969)

Judgement Date : 05 Nov 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 325 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

On June 5, 1969, the District Magistrate of 24-Parganas, West Bengal issued an order under section 3(2) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, for the detention of the petitioner. The petitioner was arrested on June 7, 1969, and provided with the grounds for his detention. On June 9, 1969, the State...
Read full Judgement
Ram Kirpal Bhagat & Ors Vs. State of Bihar [1969] INSC 325 (13 November 1969)

Judgement Date : 13 Nov 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 326 SC

Constitution of India
Customs Act, 1962
Government of India Act, 1935
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 225. Resistance or obstruction to lawful apprehension of another person
IPC Section 332. Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty
IPC Section 333. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to deter public servant from his duty
IPC Section 379. Punishment for theft

Headnote :

Nazir Mian was apprehended at the Pakur Railway Station in the Santhal Parganas region of Bihar by two Inspectors and a constable from the Central Excise Department, who were engaged in intelligence work related to Central Excise and Customs Prevention. They seized two bags of cloves from Nazir Mian...
Read full Judgement
Jain Bros. & Ors Vs. The Union of India & Ors [1969] INSC 326 (18 November 1969)

Judgement Date : 18 Nov 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 327 SC

Constitution of India
Income Tax Act, 1961

Headnote :

A notice was issued under section 22(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1922, to the appellant, a registered firm, requiring it to submit an income return for the assessment year 1960-61. Although a return was eventually filed, it was not submitted on time. The assessment was finalized in November 1964. Foll...
Read full Judgement
General Manager, Eastern Railway & ANR Vs. Jawala Prasad Singh [1969] INSC 327 (20 November 1969)

Judgement Date : 20 Nov 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 328 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The respondent, an employee of the railway, faced charges of misappropriation. To investigate these charges, an Inquiry Committee consisting of three railway officers was formed.As the proceedings progressed and several witnesses were heard, one member of the inquiry committee was transferred. The i...
Read full Judgement
Board of High School & Intermediate Education, U.P. & Othe Vs. Kumari Chittra Srivastava & Ors [1969] INSC 328 (20 November 1969)

Judgement Date : 20 Nov 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 329 SC

Headnote :

The respondent took the Intermediate examination and passed; however, instead of announcing her result, the appellant sent a letter on May 24, 1961, to the Principal of the college where the respondent was enrolled, inquiring about her attendance. According to the regulations, a candidate is require...
Read full Judgement
Narendrajit Singh ANR Vs. State of U.P. & ANR [1969] INSC 329 (21 November 1969)

Judgement Date : 21 Nov 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 330 SC

Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Smt. Somavanti & Ors Vs. The State of Punjab & Ors [1962] INSC 182 (2 May 1962)
Babu Barkya Thakur Vs. The State of Bombay & Ors [1960] INSC 120 (8 August 1960)

Headnote :

The Government of Uttar Pradesh issued a notification claiming to be under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, stating that \"the land listed in the Schedule is required for a public purpose.\" However, the notification did not indicate the specific location of the lands needed. It also...
Read full Judgement
K.M. Viswanatha Pillai Vs. K.M. Shanmugham Pillai [1969] INSC 330 (25 November 1969)

Judgement Date : 25 Nov 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 331 SC

Motor Vehicles Act, 1939

Headnote :

The appellant owned five buses, which were registered under the name of the respondent, who acted as the appellant\'s benamidar. The stage carriage permits were also issued in the respondent\'s name. The appellant, who operated the buses, filed a lawsuit to claim ownership of the buses and their per...
Read full Judgement
Jasodabai & Smt. Ramchandrabai Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ANR [1969] INSC 331 (26 November 1969)

Judgement Date : 26 Nov 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 332 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The appellants sought a certificate from the High Court to appeal the judgment and order that dismissed their petitions contesting the constitutionality of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceilings on Holdings) Act, 1961. The High Court had determined that a previous case had established that the...
Read full Judgement
Sayed Rehmanmiya Mustafamiya & Ors Vs. The State of Gujarat & Ors [1969] INSC 332 (2 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 02 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 333 SC

Headnote :

Ordinance XXV of 1948, issued by the Raj Pramukh of the former State of Saurashtra, was modified by Ordinance XXXIX of 1948 and Ordinance LXIV of 1949, leading to the governance of land revenue matters in the State by the Bombay Land Revenue Code. Section 52 of the Code empowers the Collector to det...
Read full Judgement
State of Punjab Vs. Sant Singh Kanwarjit Singh [1969] INSC 333 (4 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 04 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 334 SC

Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948
Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948

Headnote :

The taxpayer, who is registered under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, submitted its business turnover returns for the quarters ending on June 30, 1962, and September 30, 1962. The Sales Tax Officer then proceeded to assess the tax for these two quarters.The issue at hand is whether the tax c...
Read full Judgement
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Vs. Rn. Ar. Ar. Veerappa Chettiar [1969] INSC 334 (4 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 04 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 335 SC

Headnote :

The revenue authorities in Ceylon imposed estate duty on the estate of A and his son, which was held by their three widows. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council annulled this levy, and in 1957, the Government of Ceylon deposited the collected duty, along with interest, in court.On February 17...
Read full Judgement
Sidramappa Vs. Rajashetty & Ors [1969] INSC 335 (9 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 09 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 336 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The appellant sought to reopen execution proceedings in the executing court concerning certain properties and requested to be recognized as the legal representative of the property owner, asserting that he was entitled to possession as the adopted son. The court rejected his application, stating tha...
Read full Judgement
Bengal Enamel Works Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal [1969] INSC 336 (9 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 09 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 337 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, engaged in the manufacturing of enamelled ware, appointed a technical adviser and the Board of Directors decided to compensate him with 15% of the gross annual profits. For the assessment years 1951-52, 1952-53, and 1953-54, the appellant sought to claim the payments made to the techn...
Read full Judgement
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madhya Pradesh Vs. M/S. Binodiram Balchand, Indore [1969] INSC 337 (16 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 16 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 338 SC

Headnote :

The taxpayer was a Hindu undivided family based in a Part B State, with various income sources, including managing agency commissions and shares in companies and firms. Up until the assessment year 1947-48, the taxpayer used the Diwali year as its previous year. In the Diwali year 1948-49, it receiv...
Read full Judgement
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madhya Pradesh Vs. Lady Kanchanbai [1969] INSC 338 (16 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 16 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 339 SC

Headnote :

Before the assessment year 1950-51, the assessee was evaluated under the Indian Income-tax Act of 1922 as a non-resident Hindu Undivided Family. The income earned by the assessee in the former Indian State of Madhya Bharat was not taxable under the Act, but it was included in the calculation of its...
Read full Judgement
Sudhir Kumar Saha Vs. Commissioner of Police, Calcutta & ANR [1969] INSC 339 (18 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 340 SC

Preventive Detention Act, 1950

Headnote :

The petitioner, along with others, engaged in multiple offenses on three separate occasions. During the first incident, he assaulted individuals in a neighborhood using a knife and throwing bottles at them. In the subsequent two incidents, he targeted residents of a different area by throwing bombs...
Read full Judgement
Chandra Prakash Agarwal Vs. Chaturbhuj Das Parikh & Ors [1969] INSC 340 (18 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 341 SC

Legal Practitioners Act, 1879

Headnote :

The appointment of the respondent as a Judge of the High Court was contested on the basis that, despite being enrolled as an advocate for over twenty years, he could not be considered someone who \"has for at least ten years been an advocate of a High Court\" since he had only practiced in the Muffa...
Read full Judgement
Hindustan Steels Ltd., Rourkela Vs. A. K. Roy & Ors [1969] INSC 341 (18 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 342 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The first respondent was hired as a skilled worker by the appellant Company in 1958. He signed a bond agreeing to work for the Company for five years in exchange for the Company covering his training expenses. Following the Company\'s standard procedure, a verification report was requested for him,...
Read full Judgement
Hari Vishnu Kamath Vs. Gopal Swarup Pathak [1969] INSC 342 (18 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 18 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 343 SC

Headnote :

In the 1969 election for the Vice-President position, a nomination paper for a candidate referred to as \'S\' was mailed. The Returning Officer immediately rejected it, citing non-compliance with rule 4(1) of the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Rules, 1952, as it had not been submitted in person...
Read full Judgement
S. L. Agarwal Vs. General Manager, Hindustan Steel Ltd. [1969] INSC 343 (19 December 1969)

Judgement Date : 19 Dec 1969

Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 344 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The appellant\'s role as Assistant Surgeon at Hindustan Steel Ltd. in Ranchi was terminated, allegedly in accordance with his employment contract. In a petition filed under Article 226, he argued that the termination was unjust, claiming it was effectively a punitive action and that Article 311 of t...
Read full Judgement
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
latestlaws android app
latestlaws iOS app
 
Join latestlaws whatsapp group
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

Publish Your Article
 

Campus Ambassador

Campus Ambassador
 

Media Partner

Media Partner
 

Campus Buzz

campuss Buzz
 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

LatestLaws.com presents Lexidem Online Internship, 2026
 
Whatsapp Channel
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

IJJ
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition
 
IDRC (Indian dispute resolution centre)
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
Latestlaws.com App and Features
 
O P Jindal Global University
 
Vips
 
Sandeep Logistics
 
 
start up India
the world of Laws
IDRC
 
About us Events Awards Workshops Contact us Grievance Cell Disclaimer Hyperlinking Policy Privacy Policy Advertise Media Partner Legal FAQs