Caselaw | Supreme Court Judgements of february 1968

Expand

O P Jindal Global University

trademarkclick

2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Sahodrabairai Vs. Ram Singh Aharwar [1968] INSC 25 (2 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 25 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Representation of the People Act, 1951

Headnote :

The appellant submitted an election petition that included a pamphlet as an annexure. The petition contained an English translation of the pamphlet, which was stated to be part of the petition. The first respondent objected, claiming that a copy of the pamphlet was not attached to the version of the...

Read full Judgement

Management, Chitavalsah Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Workmen of Chitavalsah Jute Mills [1968] INSC 26 (2 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 26 SC

Headnote :

The appellant in this case was a jute mill. The Industrial Tribunal established a gratuity scheme for its employees, which the appellant subsequently contested in this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution.Two main arguments were presented: (i) the wage board did not have the authority to reco...

Read full Judgement

State of Punjab Vs. Dharam Singh [1968] INSC 27 (2 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 02 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 27 SC

Headnote :

The teachers who were employed in District Board Schools were transferred to the State of Punjab starting from 1st October 1957, coinciding with the provincialization of Local Bodies Schools in the State. The Punjab Educational Service (Provincialised Cadre) Class III Rules were established in 1961...

Read full Judgement

Madan Lal Ram Chandra Daga Vs. State of Maharashtra [1968] INSC 28 (5 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 05 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 28 SC

Headnote :

The three appellants, who were a partner, a munim, and a clerk of the R. R. firm, were closely related. During their transactions with the J. R. firm, which acted as bankers and commission agents, the appellants allegedly inflated the invoices for goods, created exaggerated hundies, and borrowed mon...

Read full Judgement

South Bihar Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors [1968] INSC 29 (5 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 05 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 29 SC

Headnote :

The appellant companies produced sugar using a carbonation process and paid excise duty on the sugar they manufactured, as specified in item 1 of Schedule 1 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944. An affidavit submitted by the respondents indicated that these manufacturers utilized a method involv...

Read full Judgement

Om Prabha Jain Vs. Abnash Chand & ANR [1968] INSC 30 (7 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Ghasi Ram Vs. Dal Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 31 (7 February 1968)

Headnote :

The State of Haryana was established on November 1, 1966. The Cabinet allocated certain funds for the ministers to use at their discretion for public utility purposes, aimed at benefiting the general public and uplifting backward communities. These funds were required to be distributed by March 31,...

Read full Judgement

Ghasi Ram Vs. Dal Singh & Ors [1968] INSC 31 (7 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 31 SC

Representation of the People Act, 1951

Headnote :

The first respondent was elected to the Haryana State Legislative Assembly during the elections held on February 19, 1967. The appellant contested his election through an election petition, claiming, among other things, that before the election, the respondent, who was a Minister in the State Govern...

Read full Judgement

P. D. Sharma Vs. State Bank of India [1968] INSC 32 (7 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 32 SC

Constitution of India
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

While an industrial dispute was ongoing before the Tribunal between the employer and its employees, the employer decided to terminate the appellant, who was a \'protected workman\'. Consequently, the employer sought permission from the Tribunal under section 33(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act to d...

Read full Judgement

Udai Ram Sharma & Ors Vs. Union of India & Ors [1968] INSC 33 (7 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 07 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 33 SC

Constitution of India
Government of India Act, 1935

Headnote :

In the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. V. P. Sharma, [1966] 3 S.C.R. 557, the Court determined that once a declaration was made under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894, the notification issued under section 4(1) was considered exhausted, and no further notifications under section 6 co...

Read full Judgement

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Kalyan Borough Municipality & ANR [1968] INSC 34 (8 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 34 SC

Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
Indian Electricity Act, 1910
Indian Electricity Act, 1910

Headnote :

The appellant, the Maharashtra State Electricity Board, which assumed control of electrical energy supply from the original licensee, raised the tariff and established a uniform rate for all its consumers. The respondent consumers submitted petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, arguing th...

Read full Judgement

Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen [1968] INSC 35 (8 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 35 SC

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Headnote :

The Industrial Tribunal, in its ruling regarding a company and its employees, determined that the company was not acting in good faith and that it should have utilized the proper procedures before laying off twelve of its workers. Upon appeal to this Court,HELD: (i) Once the Tribunal establishes tha...

Read full Judgement

Puttarangamma & Ors Vs. M. S. Ranganna & 3 Ors [1968] INSC 36 (8 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 08 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 36 SC

Headnote :

The head of a joint Hindu family fell ill and, having no male heirs, took steps to protect the interests of his daughters, the appellant and the fourth respondent. He sent registered notices to the other family members, clearly stating his intention to separate from them. Subsequently, he chose to r...

Read full Judgement

Moti Lal Banker Vs. Mahraj Kumar Mahmood Hasan Khan [1968] INSC 37 (9 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 09 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 37 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

A lawsuit initiated by the appellant resulted in a settlement, which was formalized in a decree on March 24, 1953. This decree mandated the respondent to pay Rs. 22,500 plus 6% interest within six months. When the respondent failed to make the payment, the appellant initiated execution proceedings o...

Read full Judgement

Lachhman Dass & Ors Vs. Municipal Committee, Jalalabad & Ors [1968] INSC 38 (12 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 12 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 38 SC

Administration of Evacuee Property (Central) Rules, 1950

Headnote :

In 1949, a specific property was classified as evacuee property, prompting the District Rent and Managing Officer in Jalalabad to begin collecting rent for it. The Municipal Committee, claiming ownership of the property, initiated a lawsuit for a declaration of its rights. The trial court referred t...

Read full Judgement

Nair Service Society Ltd. Vs. Rev. Father K. C. Alexander & Ors [1968] INSC 39 (12 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 12 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 39 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Limitation Act, 1963

Headnote :

Following a case under the Travancore Land Conservancy Regulation IV of 1094 M.E., the plaintiff was removed from 160 acres of Poramboke land. In August 1938, the appellant Society applied for a Kuthakapattom lease for this area, which was approved, and the Society took possession in July 1939. The...

Read full Judgement

Dalpat Singh & ANR Vs. State of Rajasthan [1968] INSC 40 (13 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 13 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 40 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 114. Abettor present when offence is committed
IPC Section 120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy
IPC Section 384. Punishment for extortion
IPC Section 61. Sentence of forfeiture of property

Headnote :

The appellant, a Havaldar, and the second appellant, a Subedar in the Rajasthan Armed Constabulary, were accused of extorting money from an individual by alleging that he was involved in black marketing and frequently traveling to Pakistan. They threatened that if he did not pay the demanded sum, he...

Read full Judgement

A.Vishwanath Rao Vs. The State of Mysore & Ors [1968] INSC 41 (16 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 16 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 41 SC

Motor Vehicles Act, 1939
Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950

Headnote :

The appellants were transport operators operating a \'stage carriage\' on an inter-State route that spans 28 miles, with 5 miles located in Andhra Pradesh and the remainder in Mysore. The Mysore State Road Transport Corporation, the second respondent, prepared and published a draft scheme under sect...

Read full Judgement

Ambalal Purshottam Vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation & Ors [1968] INSC 42 (19 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 19 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 42 SC

Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Headnote :

To widen a street, the municipality requested the State Government to acquire the lands within the \"line of the street\" as defined by the Municipality. Following this, the State Government issued a notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act. The landowners, with the Municipality\'s p...

Read full Judgement

Mulamchand Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [1968] INSC 43 (20 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 20 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 43 SC

Constitution of India
Government of India Act, 1935
Section 70. Obligation of person enjoying benefit of non-gratuitous act

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Yakinuddin [1962] INSC 209 (4 May 1962)

Headnote :

Prior to the enforcement of the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 (Act 1 of 1951) on April 1, 1951, the appellant had acquired the right to collect forest produce from certain landowners for the years 1951, 1952, and 1953. This right was to b...

Read full Judgement

Amolak Chand Vs. Raghuveer Singh [1968] INSC 44 (22 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 22 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 44 SC

Headnote :

The appellant and the respondent were competing candidates in the 1967 general election for the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly. In addition to them, two other candidates had submitted their nomination papers, but these were rejected because both had been proposed by the same elector. The appell...

Read full Judgement

State of Punjab & ANR Vs. Shri Sukh Raj Bahadur [1968] INSC 45 (22 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 22 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 45 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, who held a permanent position in the Delhi Administration, was appointed to the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) and was placed on an 18-month probationary period, which could be extended, contingent upon his completion of training. He successfully passed all departmental exam...

Read full Judgement

Tarak Nath Ghosh Vs. State of Bihar & Ors [1968] INSC 46 (22 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 22 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 46 SC

Constitution of India
Government of India Act, 1935

Headnote :

The appellant was appointed to the Secretary of State\'s Service, known as the Indian Police, in 1937. On June 29, 1965, while serving as a Deputy Inspector-General of Police in Bihar, the State Government issued an order suspending him pending an inquiry. This order was later partially modified by...

Read full Judgement

Western U.P. Electric Power And Supply Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors [1968] INSC 47 (23 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 23 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 47 SC

Indian Electricity Act, 1910
Indian Electricity Act, 1910

Headnote :

The petitioner company, which holds a license, was providing electrical energy to the third respondent. The Electricity Board was established under the Electric Supply Act of 1948, and the Indian Electricity (U.P.) Amendment Act of 1961 removed the Board\'s restriction on supplying electrical energy...

Read full Judgement

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Birla Cotton, Spinning And Weaving Mills, Delhi& ANR [1968] INSC 48 (23 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 23 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 48 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

On February 9, 1959, the appellant Corporation adopted a resolution in accordance with section 150(1) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act 66 of 1957 to impose certain taxes, including a tax on the consumption or sale of electricity.According to section 150(2), the Central Government approved the...

Read full Judgement

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Vs. P. K. Mukherji & ANR [1968] INSC 49 (26 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 26 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 49 SC

Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
Chartered Accountants Act, 1949

Headnote :

A joint stock company had a provident fund scheme managed by a board of trustees. The first respondent, a chartered accountant, was appointed by the company\'s board of directors to audit the Provident Fund\'s accounts for the years 1953 and 1954. In 1954, the trustees advanced over six lakhs rupees...

Read full Judgement

Arbind Kumar Singh Vs. Nand Kishore Prasad & Ors [1968] INSC 50 (26 February 1968)

Judgement Date : 26 Feb 1968

Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 50 SC

Constitution of India
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939

Headnote :

In the years 1950-51, the appellant operated his motor buses in Bihar. Bihar Act 17 of 1950 introduced a tax on passengers and goods transported by public service motor vehicles. Since the tax was deemed invalid, the appellant did not pay it. In 1961, the tax was reinstated by Act 17 of 1961, effect...

Read full Judgement

«
1
»

Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App

Join latestlaws whatsapp group

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

start up India

About us Events Awards Workshops Contact us Grievance Cell Disclaimer Hyperlinking Policy Privacy Policy Advertise Media Partner Legal FAQs