In a landmark decision aimed at safeguarding the rights and dignity of senior citizens, the Supreme Court of India has quashed a gift deed executed by a mother in favor of her son after he failed to fulfill the obligation of providing care and maintenance as stipulated. The judgment underscores the expansive powers granted to tribunals under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (the Act), to ensure the welfare of elderly citizens.
The ruling, delivered by a bench comprising Justice C.T. Ravikumar and Justice Sanjay Karol, emphasized the Act’s purpose as a “beneficial piece of legislation aimed at securing the rights of senior citizens in view of the challenges faced by them.” The Court highlighted the urgent need to interpret the Act in a manner that advances its objectives of protecting the elderly from neglect and deprivation.
“Tribunals under the Act may order eviction if it is necessary and expedient to ensure the protection of the senior citizen. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Tribunals constituted under the Act, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 23, cannot order possession to be transferred. This would defeat the purpose and object of the Act, which is to provide speedy, simple, and inexpensive remedies for the elderly.”
The dispute revolved around a property gifted by the mother to her son in 2019 on the condition that he would care for her and her husband. The transfer was accompanied by a “promissory note” ensuring their well-being. However, the mother alleged gross neglect and even physical and emotional harassment after the transfer. Seeking redressal, she approached the tribunal under Sections 22 and 23 of the Act, which annulled the gift deed.
The single judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court upheld this order, but the division bench overturned it, arguing that the conditions for maintenance were not explicitly stated in the gift deed. The Supreme Court rejected this interpretation, restoring the property to the mother and asserting that both the promissory note and the gift deed, signed simultaneously, clearly established the condition for maintenance.
The Court explained the intrinsic link between Section 23 and the Act’s objectives, stating:
“The relief available to senior citizens under Section 23 is intrinsically linked with the statement of objects and reasons of the Act, that elderly citizens of our country, in some cases, are not being looked after. It is directly in furtherance of the objectives of the Act and empowers senior citizens to secure their rights promptly when they transfer a property subject to the condition of being maintained by the transferee.”
The judgment also referred to precedents like Sudesh Chhikara v. Ramti Devi (2022) and Ashwani Kumar v. Union of India (2019) to reinforce the principle that the Act must be liberally interpreted to uphold the dignity and rights of senior citizens.
The Court ordered the property to be restored to the mother by February 28, 2025, directing the authorities in Madhya Pradesh to ensure compliance.
Picture Source :
