Sunday, 19, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Section 54. TPA, “Sale” defined.

Bare Act Title Category / State
Section 54. TPA, “Sale” defined. Property Laws
 

List of Judgements

Venigalla Koteswaramma Vs. Malampati Suryamba

Judgement Date : january/2021, Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 27 SC

Smt.Bayanabai Kaware Vs. Rajendra S/o Baburao Dhote [November 23, 2017]

Judgement Date : november/2017, Citation : 2017 Latest Caselaw 824 SC

Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana & ANR.

Judgement Date : october/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 745 SC

Janak Dulari Devi & ANR. Vs. Kapildeo Rai & ANR.

Judgement Date : april/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 344 SC

Devasahayam Vs. P. Savithramma & Ors [2005] Insc 487 (16 September 2005)

Judgement Date : september/2005, Citation : 2005 Latest Caselaw 486 SC

Balbir Singh & ANR Vs. Gurbachan Kaur & Ors [1993] INSC 432 (13 October 1993)

Judgement Date : october/1993, Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 426 SC

Headnote :

After having heard both the learned counsel, we are of the view that the appeal will have to fail on two grounds. The document Ex. P-3, upon which the appellant bases his claim contains a peculiar clause to the effect that if the sale consideration of Rs 12,000 (Rupees twelve thousand only) was not...

Vannarakkal Kallalathil Sreedharan Vs. Chandramaath Balakrishnan & ANR [1990] INSC 77 (6 March 1990)

Judgement Date : march/1990, Citation : 1990 Latest Caselaw 77 SC

Headnote :

The land in dispute was agreed to be sold in favour of the appellant under an agreement. Subsequently, a third party in execution of a decree got the property attached. The sale deed was executed thereafter. A question arose as to the validity of the sale. The High Court held that the sale would...

Bai Dosabai Vs. Mathurdas Govinddas & Ors [1980] INSC 90 (21 April 1980)

Judgement Date : april/1980, Citation : 1980 Latest Caselaw 90 SC

Headnote :

The appellant Bai Dosabhai obtained two plots of land in Survey Nos. 59 and 63 at Vastrapur from her father-in- law, Jehangirji, by way of gift. On February 25, 1946, Dosabhai executed a deed styled "a deed of lease" in favour of Indu Prasad Dev Shankar Bhatt whose successors-in- interest...

Shakuntla Vs. State of Haryana [1979] INSC 41 (16 February 1979)

Judgement Date : february/1979, Citation : 1979 Latest Caselaw 41 SC

Headnote :

The appellants were persons to whom gifts of agricultural lands were made before July 30, 1958, for love and affection, by non-related donors. The Revenue authorities decided that these gifts were not protected by s. 32FF of the PEPSU Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955, as there had been no va...

Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermenco-Operative Society Limite Vs. Sipahi Singh & Ors [1977] INSC 170 (1 September 1977)

Judgement Date : september/1977, Citation : 1977 Latest Caselaw 170 SC

Headnote :

The fishery rights in the Gangapath Islampur Jalkar which settled with the appellant for the year 1974 to 1975 (i.e. 1-7-1974 to 30--6-1975) at the Jamma of Rs. 1,50,000/- was, however, made in favour of one Sipahi Singh (Respondent No. 1) for the period commencing from July 1, 1975 to June 30, 1...

Piarey Lal Vs. Hori Lal [1977] INSC 44 (7 February 1977)

Judgement Date : february/1977, Citation : 1977 Latest Caselaw 44 SC

Headnote :

The appellant Piarey Lal had agreed to sell his original holding to Hori Lal but later refused to do so on the ground that his property which was the subject matter of the contract had been consolidated under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, and it was impossible to perform the agreemen...

Narandas Karsondas Vs. S.A. Kamtam & ANR [1976] INSC 315 (7 December 1976)

Judgement Date : december/1976, Citation : 1976 Latest Caselaw 315 SC

Headnote :

In 1964, respondent No. 1 Society was registered as a Housing Society. The Society wanted 12 plots to be constructed for its 12 members. The Society, therefore, purchased a plot of land. In 1966, the Society mortgaged the land and the incomplete structure in favour of respondent No. 2. In March, 197...

Raghunath & Ors Vs. Kedar Nath [1969] INSC 20 (3 February 1969)

Judgement Date : february/1969, Citation : 1969 Latest Caselaw 20 SC

Headnote :

D took a loan of Rs. 1700/from M, father of the defendants. On 27th July 1922, D along with his grandmother executed a possessory mortgage deed (Ex.4) in respect of a house for the amount of the aforesaid loan in favour of M. On 23rd February 1953, D's heir sold the said house to the plaintiffs...

Badri Prasad Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & ANR [1968] INSC 245 (11 October 1968)

Judgement Date : october/1968, Citation : 1968 Latest Caselaw 245 SC

Headnote :

The appellant entered into a contract in respect of certain forests in a Jagir in Madhya Pradesh. Under el. 1 of the contract, he was entitled to cut teak trees of more than 12 inches girth. Under cl. 5, the stumps of trees after cutting, had to be 3 inches high. After the passing of the Abolition o...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad Vs. M/S. Motor And General Stores (P.) Ltd. [1967] INSC 134 (2 May 1967)

Judgement Date : may/1967, Citation : 1967 Latest Caselaw 134 SC

Headnote :

The respondent private Limited Company owned a cinema house and at a meeting of its Board of Directors on September 9, 1955, it was resolved that the Managing Director may be authorised to negotiate with a buyer for the sale of the entire concern with all its equipment and machinery etc. for a consi...

Soni Lalji Jetha & Ors Vs. Soni Kalidas Devchand & Ors [1966] INSC 226 (14 October 1966)

Judgement Date : october/1966, Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 227 SC

Headnote :

The karta of a joint Hindu family executed in 1907 a deed of mortgage with possession in respect of certain family properties. After the death of the karta, the coparceners, by an agreement of sale in 1930 agreed to sell, subject to the mortgage, the properties to respondents 1 and 2. Later, the cop...

Rambaran Prosad Vs. Ram Mohit Hazra & Ors [1966] INSC 156 (6 September 1966)

Judgement Date : september/1966, Citation : 1966 Latest Caselaw 156 SC

Headnote :

There was a partition suit between two brothers T and K. The matter was referred to arbitration. Under the award the properties were divided into four blocks A, B, C and D. Blocks A and C went to T, and B and D to K. Further according to the award, the parties had agreed that 'any party in case...

Ram Saran Lall & Ors Vs. Mst. Domini Kuer & Ors [1961] INSC 193 (27 April 1961)

Judgement Date : april/1961, Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 193 SC

Headnote :

P executed a sale deed on January 31, 1946, in respect of a house in favour of D and presented it for registration on the same day. On coming to know of the execution of the sale deed, the appellant who had a right of preemption, made the talab-i-mowasibat on February 2, 1946. The deed was copied ou...

Radhakisan Laxminarayan Toshniwal Vs. Shridhar Ramchandra Alshi & Ors [1960] INSC 88 (23 April 1960)

Judgement Date : april/1960, Citation : 1960 Latest Caselaw 88 SC

Headnote :

The vendors executed an agreement for sale in respect of a certain survey number which according to the agreement was to be diverted to non-agricultural purposes and thereafter a sale deed was to be executed. In pursuance to the said agreement the vendors applied for diversion which was sanctioned s...

Tiruvenibai & ANR Vs. Smt. Lilabai [1959] INSC 7 (21 January 1959)

Judgement Date : january/1959, Citation : 1959 Latest Caselaw 7 SC

Headnote :

A document purporting to be a receipt and bearing a four anna revenue stamp was executed by M in favour of the respondent and recited, inter alia, as follows: " I have this day given 108 to you the land described below which is owned by me. Now you have become occupancy tenant of the same. You...

Ananda Behera & ANR Vs. The State of Orissa & ANR [1955] INSC 56 (27 October 1955)

Judgement Date : october/1955, Citation : 1955 Latest Caselaw 56 SC

Headnote :

The petitioners obtained oral licenses for catching and appropriating fish from specified sections of the Chilka Lake from its proprietor, the Raja of Parikud, on payment of heavy sums and obtained receipts in accordance with the prevailing practice. This was before the passing of the Orissa Estates...

Satyabrata Ghose Vs. Mugneeram Bangur & Co. & ANR [1953] INSC 70 (16 November 1953)

Judgement Date : november/1953, Citation : 1953 Latest Caselaw 70 SC

Headnote :

The doctrine of frustration is really an aspect or part of the law of discharge of contract by reason of supervening impossibility or illegality of the act agreed to be done and hence comes within the purview of S. 56 of the Indian Contract Act.. The view that s. 56 applies only to cases of physical...