2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

S. Pratap Singh Vs. The State of Punjab [1963] INSC 186 (2 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 02 Sep 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 214 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The appellant served as a civil surgeon for the State of Punjab, having joined the Punjab Civil Medical Service in 1947. In 1956, he was assigned to Jull, where he remained until he took leave in preparation for retirement in December 1960. His leave was approved on December 18, 1960, and published...

Read full Judgement

Gopal Narain Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & ANR [1963] INSC 187 (3 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 03 Sep 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 215 SC

Constitution of India

Pannalal Binjraj Vs. Union of India [1956] INSC 86 (21 December 1956)

Headnote :

Bareilly was initially divided into two distinct sections.In 1870, the Municipality invested significantly to develop the vacant land between these two sections into a new residential area. Special facilities were provided for the residents, and a house tax was introduced. Following the enactment of...

Read full Judgement

Smt. Kaushalya Devi Vs. Shri Mool, Raj & Ors [1963] INSC 188 (4 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 04 Sep 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 216 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 120B. Punishment of criminal conspiracy

Headnote :

Criminal proceedings were initiated against the petitioner and three others based on a complaint from the first respondent, who alleged that the four accused had committed offenses under Section 420 in conjunction with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Initially, the Magistrate had excused the...

Read full Judgement

Anand Nivas (Private) Ltd. Vs. Anandji Kalyanji Pedhi & Ors [1963] INSC 189 (5 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 05 Sep 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 217 SC

Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
Section 52. TPA, Transfer of property pending suit relating thereto.

Headnote :

The respondents granted a five-year lease of the ground and first floor of a building called Anand Bhawan in Ahmedabad to one Maneklal. After the lease expired, the respondents filed a lawsuit against Maneklal seeking a decree for eviction and recovery of unpaid rent, which was granted.However, afte...

Read full Judgement

Rameshwar Shaw Vs. District Magistrate, Burdwan & ANR [1963] INSC 190 (11 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 11 Sep 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 218 SC

CrPC Section 173. Report of police officer on completion of investigation

Headnote :

The petitioner was detained by the District Magistrate\'s order under the Preventive Detention Act of 1950. The order stated that the District Magistrate believed it was necessary to detain the petitioner to prevent him from engaging in activities harmful to public order. This order was delivered to...

Read full Judgement

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Gundugola Venkata Suryanarayana Garu [1963] INSC 191 (12 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 12 Sep 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 219 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The Government of Madras implemented the Madras Estates Rent Reduction Act of 1947 for the lands in the village of Mallinadhapuram, arguing that the grant encompassed the entire village, thus qualifying as an estate under Section 3(2)(d) of the Madras Estates Land Act of 1908. The respondent, along...

Read full Judgement

Babu Lal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors [1963] INSC 192 (18 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 18 Sep 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 220 SC

CrPC Section 476. Forms
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 192. Fabricating false evidence
IPC Section 193. Punishment for false evidence
IPC Section 463. Forgery
IPC Section 464. Making a false document
IPC Section 471. Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record

Headnote :

In a civil case, the appellant was called as a witness and presented an agreement that the Munsiff believed to be forged. However, the Munsiff did not document the necessary opinion to initiate prosecution of the appellant under section 479A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in his judgment. Before...

Read full Judgement

Kaushalya Rani Vs. Gopal Singh [1963] INSC 193 (19 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 19 Oct 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 221 SC

CrPC Section 417. Power to appoint place of imprisonment

Headnote :

The respondent was sent to the Court of Sessions to face trial but was acquitted by the Additional Sessions Judge on December 31, 1959. On April 22, 1960, the appellant submitted an application to the High Court under section 417(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking Special Leave to appeal...

Read full Judgement

State of Punjab Vs. Jagdip Singh & Ors [1963] INSC 194 (19 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 19 Oct 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 222 SC

Constitution of India

Headnote :

The individuals serving as officiating Tahsildars in the former State of PEPSU were officially recognized as Tahsildars through a Notification from the Financial Commissioner. At that time, there were no available positions for the respondents to be confirmed. The following day, the Rajpramukh appro...

Read full Judgement

Afzal Ullah Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [1963] INSC 195 (20 September 1963)

Judgement Date : 20 Sep 1963

Citation : 1963 Latest Caselaw 223 SC

P. Balakotaiah Vs. The Union of India & Ors [1957] INSC 110 (3 December 1957)

Headnote :

The appellant-accused faced charges under section 299(1) of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, in conjunction with clause 3(a) of the relevant byelaws established by Respondent No. 2. The allegations against the appellant stated that he operated a market within the municipal area where vegetab...

Read full Judgement