Wednesday, 15, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
The Nandlal Bhandari Mills Ltd.,Indore Vs. The State of Madhya Bharat [1961] INSC 223 (17 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 17 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 223 SC

Headnote :

By a Cabinet Resolution of the Holkar State certain Rules known as The Indore Industrial Tax Rules were framed for the purpose of levying industrial tax. After the decision of the Privy Council in cherry Railway Go., Ltd. v. Commissioner Income,-tax, (1931) L. R. 58 1. A. 239, disallowing deduction...
Rajah S. Vs. Jagannath Rao Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Hyderabad [1961] INSC 224 (17 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 17 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 224 SC

Headnote :

The appellant who was a jagirdar in the former Hyderabad State was assessed to income-tax and super-tax for the assessment years, 1337 Fasli and 1358 Fasli, corresponding to the years, 1948-49 and 1949-50, under the provisions of the Hyderabad Income-tax Act, 1357 Fasli, which was passed by the Hyde...
Shri Kanhaiyalal Lohia Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal [1961] INSC 225 (17 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 17 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 225 SC

Headnote :

The appellant supported his brother and his nephew for a number of years as they were doing no work. In the year 1943 he made a gift of Rs. 7,60,000 odd to them though he had to overdraw his account with the Bank and to pay interest or the amount borrowed to raise the money. He also made a transfer...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombaycity Ii Vs. Shakuntala & Ors [1961] INSC 226 (18 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 18 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 226 SC

Headnote :

A Hindu undivided family was the beneficiary of 1842 shares in a company; but the shares were held in the names of different members of the family. For the assessment year 1949-50 the Income-tax Officer applied the provisions of s. 23A of the Income-tax Act, 1922 (as it stood at that time) and order...
The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Thadi Narayana [1961] INSC 227 (24 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 24 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 227 SC

Headnote :

The accused was tried for offences under s. 302 and s. 392 Indian Penal Code. The Sessions judge acquitted her under s. 302 and s. 392 but convicted her under s. 411 Indian Penal code. The accused appealed to the High Court against her conviction under s. 41 1. The State did not appeal against the a...
Seth Bikhraj Jaipuria Vs. Union of India [1961] INSC 228 (24 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 24 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 228 SC

Headnote :

In the year 1943 the Divisional Superintendent, East Indian Railway placed certain purchase orders with the appellant for the supply of food grains for the employees of the East Indian Railway. The orders were not expressed to be made in the name of the Governor-General and were not "executed o...
The Indore Iron and Steel Registered stock-Holders' Associa Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors [1961] INSC 229 (26 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 26 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 229 SC

Headnote :

The constituent members of the appellant Association, who carried on business in iron and steel articles were assessed to sales tax for the years 1953-54 and 1954-55 under a notification dated October 24, 1953, issued by the State of Madhya Bharat under s. 5(2) of the Madhya Bharat Sales Tax Act, Sa...
Kanshi Ram Jagan Nath & Ors Vs. The State [1961] INSC 230 (28 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 28 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 230 SC

Headnote :

The Council of Regency of the erstwhile State of Patiala issued an order dated February 6, 1919, imposing a royalty on bricks from all kiln. owners at the rate of Rs. 50 per one lakh. After the State of Patiala became merged with the Patiala and East Punjab States Union, a Part B State under the Con...
The Ahmedabad Miscellaneous Industrial Workers' Union Vs. The Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. [1961] INSC 231 (28 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 28 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 231 SC

Headnote :

The respondent, which is an electricity company, contested the claim of the appellant for three months' wages as bonus on the ground that if calculation was made on the Full Bench Formula evolved by the Labour Appellate Tribunal and approved by this Court in the Associated Cement Companies Ltd....
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2024

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2024', Apply Now!

 
 
 
 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz