Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
The Nandlal Bhandari Mills Ltd.,Indore Vs. The State of Madhya Bharat [1961] INSC 223 (17 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 17 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 223 SC

Headnote :

A Cabinet Resolution from the Holkar State established certain regulations known as The Indore Industrial Tax Rules to impose an industrial tax. Following the Privy Council\'s ruling in Cherry Railway Co., Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax (1931) L.R. 58 I.A. 239, which prohibited the deduction of...
Rajah S. Vs. Jagannath Rao Vs. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Hyderabad [1961] INSC 224 (17 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 17 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 224 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a jagirdar from the former Hyderabad State, was subject to income-tax and super-tax assessments for the years 1337 Fasli and 1358 Fasli, which correspond to 1948-49 and 1949-50, under the Hyderabad Income-tax Act, 1357 Fasli. This Act was enacted by the Hyderabad Legislative Assembly...
Shri Kanhaiyalal Lohia Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax, West Bengal [1961] INSC 225 (17 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 17 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 225 SC

Headnote :

The appellant financially supported his brother and nephew for several years while they were unemployed. In 1943, he gifted them approximately Rs. 7,60,000, despite having to overdraw his bank account and incur interest on the borrowed funds. Additionally, he transferred some of his businesses to th...
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Bombaycity Ii Vs. Shakuntala & Ors [1961] INSC 226 (18 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 18 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 226 SC

Headnote :

A Hindu undivided family was the recipient of 1842 shares in a company, although these shares were registered in the names of various family members. For the assessment year 1949-50, the Income-tax Officer invoked section 23A of the Income-tax Act, 1922 (as it was then), and determined that the undi...
The State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Thadi Narayana [1961] INSC 227 (24 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 24 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 227 SC

Headnote :

The defendant faced trial for offenses under sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The Sessions judge acquitted her of these charges but convicted her under section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The defendant appealed to the High Court regarding her conviction under section 411. The State d...
Seth Bikhraj Jaipuria Vs. Union of India [1961] INSC 228 (24 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 24 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 228 SC

Headnote :

In 1943, the Divisional Superintendent of the East Indian Railway issued several purchase orders to the appellant for supplying food grains to the railway employees. These orders were not made in the name of the Governor-General and did not comply with the requirements of Section 175 (3) of the Gove...
The Indore Iron and Steel Registered stock-Holders' Associa Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors [1961] INSC 229 (26 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 26 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 229 SC

Headnote :

The members of the appellant Association, engaged in the business of iron and steel products, were assessed sales tax for the years 1953-54 and 1954-55 based on a notification issued on October 24, 1953, by the State of Madhya Bharat under section 5(2) of the Madhya Bharat Sales Tax Act, Samvat 2007...
Kanshi Ram Jagan Nath & Ors Vs. The State [1961] INSC 230 (28 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 28 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 230 SC

Headnote :

The Council of Regency of the former State of Patiala issued an order on February 6, 1919, establishing a royalty on bricks from all kiln owners at a rate of Rs. 50 per one lakh. Following the merger of the State of Patiala with the Patiala and East Punjab States Union, which became a Part B State u...
The Ahmedabad Miscellaneous Industrial Workers' Union Vs. The Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. [1961] INSC 231 (28 July 1961)

Judgement Date : 28 Jul 1961

Citation : 1961 Latest Caselaw 231 SC

Headnote :

The electricity company, as the respondent, disputed the appellant\'s claim for three months\' wages as a bonus, arguing that if the calculation were based on the Full Bench Formula established by the Labour Appellate Tribunal and endorsed by this Court in the case of Associated Cement Companies Ltd...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter