2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Raghunath Das Vs. Gokal Chand & ANR [1958] INSC 55 (1 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 01 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 55 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The phrase \"specific moveable property\" as mentioned in Article 49 of the Indian Limitation Act refers exclusively to particular items of moveable property for which the plaintiff has the right to demand immediate possession from the defendant, who has either wrongfully taken or is wrongfully reta...

Read full Judgement

Shewpujanrai Indrasanrai Ltd. Vs. The Collector of Customs & Ors [1958] INSC 56 (9 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 09 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 56 SC

Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia Vs. Shri Justice S. R. Tendolkar & Ors [1958] INSC 30 (28 March 1958)
R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla Vs. The Union of India [1957] INSC 32 (9 April 1957)
F. N. Roy Vs. Collector of Customs, Calcutta [1957] INSC 48 (16 May 1957)

Headnote :

The appellant company operated as a bullion merchant and purchased approximately 9478 tolas of gold. Upon receiving information that the gold was smuggled, customs authorities issued a notice to the appellant indicating that the case was referred to the Collector of Customs for adjudication by the S...

Read full Judgement

Mazagaon Dock Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Income-Tax and Excess Profits Tax [1958] INSC 57 (12 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 12 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 57 SC

Headnote :

According to Section 42(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, if a person who is not a resident or not ordinarily resident in the taxable territories conducts business with a resident person in those territories, and the Income-tax Officer finds that the business arrangement is such that the reside...

Read full Judgement

Bishan Singh & Ors Vs. Khazan Singh & ANR [1958] INSC 58 (20 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 20 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 58 SC

Headnote :

After the sale of certain village land, the appellants initiated a pre-emption suit, resulting in a compromise decree that permitted pre-emption contingent upon the appellants depositing the purchase amount by a specified date. The appellants deposited the amount and took possession of the land. How...

Read full Judgement

Gallu Sah Vs. The State of Bihar [1958] INSC 59 (20 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 20 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 59 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 109. Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment
IPC Section 149. Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object
IPC Section 323. Punishment for voluntarily causing hurt

Headnote :

The prosecution argued that a group of 40-50 individuals, including the appellant, formed an unlawful assembly with the shared intent to demolish R\'s hut, set it on fire, and commit assault if met with resistance. They assaulted several individuals, and the appellant instructed one Budi to ignite t...

Read full Judgement

Anant Gopal Sheorey Vs. The State of Bombay [1958] INSC 60 (22 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 22 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 60 SC

IPC Section 477A. Falsification of accounts

Headnote :

A complaint was lodged against the appellant on January 13, 1953, and the Special Magistrate began recording evidence on July 4, 1955. During the trial, the Criminal Procedure Code (Amendment) Act (26 of 1955) came into effect on January 2, 1956, which introduced section 342 A into the Code of Crimi...

Read full Judgement

The State of Mysore Vs. The Workers of Gold Mines [1958] INSC 61 (22 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 22 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 61 SC

Headnote :

This case involved an appeal regarding a bonus awarded to the workers of the Mysore gold mining industries, which were managed by a company at the time. A clause in the lease agreement allowed the companies to establish a reserve fund for depreciation and development costs by allocating 15% of the r...

Read full Judgement

Razia Begum Vs. Sahebzadi Anwar Begum & Ors [1958] INSC 62 (23 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 23 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 62 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

The appellant filed a lawsuit against the third respondent, seeking a declaration that she was his legally married wife. She claimed that, despite the fact that their marriage was known to those close to him, he was attempting to conceal this information, leading his family to believe she was not hi...

Read full Judgement

Maktul Vs. Mst. Manbhari & Ors [1958] INSC 63 (23 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 23 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 63 SC

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)

Headnote :

According to the customary law in Punjab, property that a Hindu male inherits from his maternal grandfather is not considered ancestral property in relation to his sons.This principle was upheld in the case of Narotam Chand v. Mst. Durga Devi, I. L. R. (1950) Punj. 1.However, the cases of Lehna v. M...

Read full Judgement

Mahant Ramdhan Puri Vs. Bankey Bihari Saran & Ors [1958] INSC 64 (23 May 1958)

Judgement Date : 23 May 1958

Citation : 1958 Latest Caselaw 64 SC

Constitution of India
Section 76. TPA, Liabilities of mortgagee in possession.
Section 77. TPA, Receipts in lieu of interest.
Section 98. TPA,Rights and liabilities of parties to anomalous mortgages.
Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Headnote :

D executed a document in favor of M, hypothecating an eight annas share in a village to settle a debt of Rs. 29,496 owed to Al. This property was already subject to a pre-existing thika in favor of J for a duration of 9 years, under which D received Rs. 2,205 as peshgi money without interest, with a...

Read full Judgement