Friday, 24, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Parshotam Lal Dhingra Vs. Union of India [1957] INSC 95 (1 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 01 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 95 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, Parshotam Lal Dhingra, joined the Indian Railway Service as a Signaller (Telegraphist) in 1924 and was promoted to Chief Controller in 1950, both positions being classified as Class III Service. On July 2, 1951, he was appointed to act in Class II Service as Assistant Superintendent o...
The Sree Meenakshi Mills, Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen [1957] INSC 96 (5 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 05 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 96 SC

Headnote :

The workers requested a bonus for the year 1950-5, claiming that the employers had made profits during that period. The employers opposed this request, arguing that there was a trading loss that year, thus no bonus was due. To calculate the available surplus for bonus payments, the employers subtrac...
Patna Electric Supply Co., Ltd., Patna. Vs. Bali Rai & ABR [1957] INSC 97 (5 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 05 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 97 SC

Headnote :

The appellant submitted an application to the Industrial Tribunal under section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking permission to dismiss the respondents, who were its employees, due to misconduct as per clause 17 (b) (viii) of the appellant\'s Standing Orders. However, after reassessin...
Nohiria Ram Vs. The Union of India & Ors [1957] INSC 98 (8 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 08 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 98 SC

Headnote :

The appellant initially worked as a civilian clerk in the Royal Air Force in Quetta. Later, upon his application to the Director General of the Indian Medical Service, he was appointed as an additional clerk in the Director General\'s office to handle tasks for the Indian Research Fund Association,...
Sri Venkataramana Devaru& Ors Vs. The State of Mysore & Ors [1957] INSC 99 (8 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 08 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 99 SC

Headnote :

This case involved an appeal by the trustees of the historic and esteemed Sri Venkataramana temple located in Moolky Petta. The trustees managed the temple on behalf of the Gowda Saraswath Brahmins, following a Scheme established in a lawsuit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. After th...
The Aggarwal Chamber of Vs. M/S Ganpat Rai Hira Lal [1957] INSC 100 (11 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 11 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 100 SC

Headnote :

In April or May of 1920, following the death of R, a Hindu jat, the widow of his deceased son H took control of the properties. On August 24, 1920, she secured a mutation in the settlement records, designating her as the owner of the lands previously owned by R. A gift of half of the properties from...
Mst. Kirpal Kaur Vs. Bachan Singh & Ors [1957] INSC 101 (15 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 15 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 101 SC

Headnote :

In April or May of 1920, following the death of R, a Hindu jat, the widow of his deceased son H took control of the properties. On August 24, 1920, she secured a mutation in the settlement records, designating her as the owner of the lands previously owned by R. A gift of half of the properties from...
Sashi Mohan Debnath & Ors Vs. The State of West Bengal [1957] INSC 102 (19 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 19 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 102 SC

Headnote :

Sections 306 and 307 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, when read together, clearly state that if a Sessions judge disagrees with the jury\'s verdict and believes the case should be referred to the High Court, he is required to submit the entire case against the accused, rather than just a portion o...
The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. M/S. Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. & ABR [1957] INSC 103 (20 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 20 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 103 SC

Headnote :

Clause 16 of General Order No. 615, issued by the Governor on March 15, 1951, under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, stipulated that the Tribunal or Adjudicator must announce their decision within 40 days from the date of reference. On August 19, 1952, and January 20, 1953, the Gover...
Asa Ram & ABR Vs. Mst. Ram Kali & ABR [1957] INSC 104 (21 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 21 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 104 SC

Headnote :

Section 29(a) of the U.P. Tenancy Act, 1939, states that any individual who was a tenant of land at the start of the Act is entitled to all the rights of hereditary tenants as defined by the Act. However, certain categories of tenants are excluded from this provision, including tenants of Sir lands....
Choudhury Dharam Singh Rathi Vs. The State of Punjab & Ors [1957] INSC 105 (25 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 25 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 105 SC

Headnote :

The timely submission of the Advisory Board\'s report as mandated by section 10 of the Preventive Detention Act is crucial for the detenu. If the Board fails to submit the report within the specified timeframe, any continued detention beyond that period is deemed unlawful.Therefore, in a situation w...
Indu Bhusan Chatterjee Vs. The State of West Bengal [1957] INSC 106 (26 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 26 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 106 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a public servant, was found guilty under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, and Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code for accepting an illegal gratification of Rs. 100. The appellant argued that the conviction was flawed because the sanction for his prosecution was...
Sardar Syedna Tahersaifuddin Saheb Vs. The State of Bombay [1957] INSC 107 (27 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 27 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 107 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, serving as the religious leader of his community, excommunicated T, who subsequently initiated a lawsuit seeking a declaration that the excommunication order was invalid. While the lawsuit was ongoing, the Bombay Prevention of Excommunication Act, 1949, was enacted, raising the questi...
S. Rm. Ar. S. Sp. Sathappa Chettiar Vs. S. Rm. Ar. Rm. Ramanathan Chettiar [1957] INSC 108 (28 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 28 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 108 SC

Headnote :

The calculation of court fees in cases governed by section 7(IV) of the Court-Fees Act is based on the valuation that the plaintiff chooses to assign to their claim. Once the plaintiff makes this choice and establishes a value for their claim, that value also serves as the basis for jurisdiction und...
Rajvi Amar Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan [1957] INSC 109 (28 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 28 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 109 SC

Headnote :

The appellant served as a District and Session judge in the State of Bikaner and continued in this role after the state\'s merger into the new State of Rajasthan on August 7, 1949. The integration covenant stipulated that his service conditions would not be less favorable than those in effect on Nov...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter