Sunday, 19, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 
Parshotam Lal Dhingra Vs. Union of India [1957] INSC 95 (1 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 01 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 95 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, Parshotam Lal Dhingra, was appointed to the Indian Railway Service as a Signaller (Telegraphist) in 1924 and was promoted to the post of Chief Controller in 1950, both the posts being in class III Service. On July 2, 1951, he was appointed to officiate in class II Service as Asst. Sup...
The Sree Meenakshi Mills, Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen [1957] INSC 96 (5 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 05 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 96 SC

Headnote :

The workmen demanded bonus for the year 1950-5, on the allegation that the employers had made profits during the relevant year. The employers resisted the demand on the ground that 879 there was a trading loss in the year and as such no bonus was payable. To determine the available surplus out of wh...
Patna Electric Supply Co., Ltd., Patna. Vs. Bali Rai & ABR [1957] INSC 97 (5 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 05 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 97 SC

Headnote :

The appellant made an application before the Industrial Tribunal under s. 33 Of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for permission to dismiss the respondents, its employees, on the ground of misconduct under cl. 17 (b) (viii) of the appellant's Standing 872 Orders, but subsequently, on a reconsid...
Nohiria Ram Vs. The Union of India & Ors [1957] INSC 98 (8 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 08 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 98 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was originally employed as a civilian clerk in the Royal Air Force, Quetta, but subsequently on application made by him to the Director General of Indian Medical Service, he was appointed as an additional clerk in the office of the Director General to deal with the work of the Indian R...
Sri Venkataramana Devaru& Ors Vs. The State of Mysore & Ors [1957] INSC 99 (8 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 08 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 99 SC

Headnote :

This was an appeal by the trustees of the ancient and renowned temple of Sri Venkataramana of Moolky Petta, who were managing the temple on behalf of the Gowda Saraswath Brahmins in accordance with a Scheme framed in a suit under s. 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure. After the passing of the Madras...
The Aggarwal Chamber of Vs. M/S Ganpat Rai Hira Lal [1957] INSC 100 (11 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 11 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 100 SC

Headnote :

On the death of R, a Hindu jat, in April or May, 1920, the widow of his pre-deceased son, H, took possession of the properties and on August 24, 1920, obtained a mutation of the settlement records showing her as the owner of the lands in the place of R. A gift of half of the properties by H to her d...
Mst. Kirpal Kaur Vs. Bachan Singh & Ors [1957] INSC 101 (15 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 15 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 101 SC

Headnote :

On the death of R, a Hindu jat, in April or May, 1920, the widow of his pre-deceased son, H, took possession of the properties and on August 24, 1920, obtained a mutation of the settlement records showing her as the owner of the lands in the place of R. A gift of half of the properties by H to her d...
Sashi Mohan Debnath & Ors Vs. The State of West Bengal [1957] INSC 102 (19 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 19 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 102 SC

Headnote :

Sections 306 and 307 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, read together clearly indicate that where the Sessions judge disagrees with the verdict of the jury and is of the opinion that the case should be submitted to the High Court, he must submit the whole case against the accused, not a part of it....
The State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. M/S. Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. & ABR [1957] INSC 103 (20 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 20 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 103 SC

Headnote :

Clause 16 of the General Order No. 6,5 made by the Governor on March I5, 195,, under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 947, provided that the decision of the Tribunal or 972 Adjudicator shall be pronounced within 4o days from the date of reference. By orders dated August 19, 1952, and Janua...
Asa Ram & ABR Vs. Mst. Ram Kali & ABR [1957] INSC 104 (21 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 21 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 104 SC

Headnote :

Section 29(a) of the U. P. Tenancy Act, 1939, provides that every person who was at the commencement of the Act a tenant of land shall be entitled to all the rights of hereditary tenants under the Act. Some classes of tenants are excepted from the operation of this provision, and one of them is tena...
Choudhury Dharam Singh Rathi Vs. The State of Punjab & Ors [1957] INSC 105 (25 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 25 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 105 SC

Headnote :

Submission of its report by the Advisory Board under s. 10 of the Preventive Detention Act within the time prescribed by that section is of the utmost importance to the detenu and if the Board fails to do so any further detention beyond that period becomes unlawful. Consequently, where the case o...
Indu Bhusan Chatterjee Vs. The State of West Bengal [1957] INSC 106 (26 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 26 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 106 SC

Headnote :

The appellant, a public servant, was convicted under S. 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, and under s. 161 of the Indian Penal Code on a charge of accepting a sum of Rs. 100 as illegal gratification. It was contended for the appellant that the conviction was bad on the ground that the...
Sardar Syedna Tahersaifuddin Saheb Vs. The State of Bombay [1957] INSC 107 (27 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 27 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 107 SC

Headnote :

The appellant as the religious head of his community ex- communicated T who thereupon filed a suit for a declaration that the order of excommunication was invalid. When the suit was pending the Bombay Prevention of Excommunication Act, 1949, was passed and one of issues raised in the suit was whethe...
S. Rm. Ar. S. Sp. Sathappa Chettiar Vs. S. Rm. Ar. Rm. Ramanathan Chettiar [1957] INSC 108 (28 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 28 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 108 SC

Headnote :

The computation of Court fees in suits falling under s. 7(IV) of the Court-Fees Act depends upon the valuation which the plaintiff in his option puts on his claim and once he exercises his option and values his claim, such value must also be the value for purposes of jurisdiction under s. 8 of the S...
Rajvi Amar Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan [1957] INSC 109 (28 November 1957)

Judgement Date : 28 Nov 1957

Citation : 1957 Latest Caselaw 109 SC

Headnote :

The appellant was a District and Session judge in the State of Bikaner and after its merger in the new State of Rajasthan, on August 7, 1949, continued to serve in the new State. The covenant of intergration provided, inter alia, that the conditions of such service were to be no less advantageous th...
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2024

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2024', Apply Now!

 
 
 
 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz