Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Joydeb Sulka Das And Ors vs The In-Charge
2025 Latest Caselaw 520 Tri

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 520 Tri
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2025

Tripura High Court

Sri Joydeb Sulka Das And Ors vs The In-Charge on 7 February, 2025

Author: T. Amarnath Goud
Bench: T. Amarnath Goud
                                HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                                      AGARTALA
                                    LA.App 42 of 2024
Sri Joydeb Sulka Das and Ors.
                                                                          ---Petitioner(s)
                                         Versus
The In-Charge, HR-IR, ONGC, Tripura Asset, Badharghat, Agartala
                                                                        ---Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s)                   :     Mr. P.K. Dhar, Sr. Advocate.
                                         Mr. Rahul Debnath, Advocate.
                                         Ms. Priya Saha, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)                  :     Mr. P. Gautam, Advocate.
                                         Mr. K. Debbarma, Advocate.

                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD

                                         Order

07.02.2025

This is an appeal under Section 54 of the LA Act, 1894 against the

judgment and award dated 27.03.2024 passed by the Ld. LA Judge, Sepahijala District,

Sonamura in Case No.Civil Misc(LA) 29 of 2014 dismissing the case of the referring

claimant appellants and confirming the award passed by the learned Land Acquisition

Collector, Sepahijala District.

[2] It is the case of the appellant that Late Charu Chandra Sukla Das,

predecessor of the Referring Claimant Appellants, was possessing and enjoying the

acquired land measuring 0.82 acre of Khatian No.592 of Mouja Khedabari under

Sonamura Sub-Division which was acquired for construction of GCS of Respondent

No.1 by Notification dated 25.03.2006. Land Acquisition Collector, Sepahijala District

made award of compensation which was objected by the predecessor of the Referring

Claimant Appellants and made prayer for referring the matter to the Learned Land

Acquisition Judge, Sepahijala District, Sonamura for enhancement of the award and other

similar cases also referred. The Learned Land Acquisition Judge, Sepahijala District,

Sonamura passed Judgment and Award in similar different cases but in Case No. Civil

Misc. (LA) 29 of 2014, the Learned Land Acquisition Judge, Sepahijala District,

Sonamura virtually dismissed the same confirming the award passed by the Learned

Land Acquisition Collector, Sepahijala District and therefore, the Referring Claimant

Appellants have preferred appeal under Section 54 of the L.A. Act against the said

Judgment and Award dated 27.03.2024 passed in Civil Misc. (LA) 29 of 2014.

[3]            Heard learned counsel for the parties.

[4]            On the last occasion, learned counsel for the appellant made a prayer before

this court to grant a reasonable time for ascertaining and procuring the original title

deed/ownership document from his client. Today when the case is called for

consideration, at the very outset, a copy of the sale deed purchased by the father of the

appellants/claimants during 1964 is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellants.

On course of the argument, he has also submitted before this court that for not proving

the title before the learned court below, his case was dismissed. Aggrieved by the said

order, he has approached before this court by way of filing the instant appeal. The

appellant is also relying upon the said document for getting fair compensation from the

respondents.

[5] After going through the record, this court thinks that the matter needs

further examination and deciding the veracity of the title deed which is placed on record,

it is not for this court to examine the document in this appeal stage. If a portion of land is

acquired from a lawful owner, he is entitled for all benefits by fixing the fair

compensation. In support of such document as an owner, the appellant relies upon the

document for getting compensation. This court further opines that unless there is a

specific document to prove the alienable right, title and interest upon the said land, it

cannot be construed that the claimants are the lawful owners of the property and are

entitled for compensation.

[6] In view of the above observation, this court is of the opinion that present

matter be remanded back by setting aside the impugned order dated 27.03.2024 of the

learned court below. The court below shall re-examine the matter by giving opportunity

to both sides for filing relevant documents and also frame additional issues on alienable

right, title and interest. The claimant shall also produce any such document claiming him

to be the lawfully owners of the land in question by placing title deed, if any. The

claimant is also at liberty to adduce any other relevant documents supporting his claim.

[7] With the above observation and direction, this present appeal is remanded

back and accordingly, the same is disposed of. As a sequel, stay, if any, stands vacated.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands closed.





                                                                         JUDGE




   Dipak



DIPAK        DIPAK DAS

DAS          16:37:42 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter