Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Abhijit Das & Ors vs The State Of Tripura & Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 1039 Tri

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1039 Tri
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2024

Tripura High Court

Sri Abhijit Das & Ors vs The State Of Tripura & Ors on 2 July, 2024

                         HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                               AGARTALA
                    I.A. No.01 of 2024 in W.A. No.56 of 2024
                               W.A. No.56 of 2024

Sri Abhijit Das & Ors.
                                                        ......Appellant-Applicant(s)
                              VERSUS
The State of Tripura & Ors.
                                                     ...... Respondent(s)

For Appellant-Applicants(s) : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Adv.

Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharjee, GA

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. PURKAYASTHA

_O_R_D_E_R_

02.07.2024 We have heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicants and the

State-respondents on the prayer for condonation of delay of 137 days in

preferring the appeal through I.A. No.01 of 2024.

Learned senior counsel for the writ petitioners submits that since

the case of the present appellants is covered by the judgment rendered by this

Court in Writ Appeal No.32 of 2024 dated 23rd April, 2024 in respect of one of

the writ petitioners i.e. in W.P.(C) No.383 of 2022, the delay may be condoned

and the appeal may be disposed of in similar manners.

Learned counsel for the State does not dispute the factual position

that these present appellants were also writ petitioners in the impugned

judgment dated 11th December, 2023 passed in W.P.(C) No.383 of 2022.

Having regard to the communality of facts and the case of the

parties, we are inclined to condone the delay on being satisfied to the

explanations urged and accordingly, the I.A. is disposed of.

We find from the records that these appellants along with another

Sri Asis Debnath, appellant in W.A. No.32 of 2024 have approached this Court

for regularization of the services and for pay parity or rather minimum scale of

pay with regularly situated employees. The Writ Court had refused to grant

relief. However, on consideration of the submission of the learned counsel for

the parties, this Court had disposed of the said writ appeal in the following

manner:

"We have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the parties and gone through the impugned judgment as well. It is true that the regularization scheme has been repealed on 31st July, 2018 by the State of Tripura but if the writ petitioners have been engaged on daily rated basis or contractual basis against sanctioned vacant post of drivers and have been continued for more than 10 years by now since their engagement in 2011, the petitioners' case for minimum scale of pay requires consideration at the level of the competent authority. The writ petitioners have not entered through the regular recruitment process by way of an advertisement but have continued to discharge the duties as drivers for more than 10 years on the wages of a daily rated employee. As such, we are inclined to direct the respondents authority to consider the claim of the writ petitioners for minimum scale of pay to the writ petitioners on the post they are working. The writ petitioners are at liberty to make a representation within 2[two] weeks along with supporting documents. The competent authority under the respondents would consider the claim of the writ petitioners in accordance with law on such prayer within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of such representation along with a copy of this order.

The instant appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of."

Since the case of the appellants is on identical footing as that of

Sri Asis Debnath, appellant in W.A. No.32 of 2024, the present appeal is

also disposed of on same lines. The impugned judgment of the learned

Single Judge stands interfered to the above extent.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

      (S.D PURKAYASTHA), J                                (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ




SUJAY GHOSH        GHOSH
                   Date: 2024.07.04 11:43:15 +05'30'

      Sujay
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter