Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1350 Raj
Judgement Date : 30 January, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:5654]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2349/2026
Hemant Bohra S/o Jai Prakash Bohra, Aged About 26 Years,
Sunaron Ki Gali, Ward No. 12, Pokhran, Po Pokaran, District
Jaisalmer, Rajasthan 345021.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Superintendent Of
Police, Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
2. Hdfc Bank, Through Its Branch Manager, Branch Pokhran
Branch, Bhadri Complex, Phalsund Tiraha, Jodhpur Road,
Pokhran, Jaisalmer.
3. Station House Officer, Anekal, Bangalore, District
Bangalore, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemshankar Vyas
Mr. Virendra
For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL
Order
30/01/2026
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following
reliefs:-
"a. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent may kindly be directed to un-
freeze the HDFC Bank account no.50100692248212 of the petitioner. b. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent may kindly be restrained from freezing the bank account of the petitioner in future in connection with MHA complaint acknowledgment no.
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 06:18:28 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:5654] (2 of 3) [CW-2349/2026]
31610240084313 as PS-Anekal, District- BANGALORE, Karnataka.
c. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent may kindly be directed to not freeze the bank account of the petitioner in future without prior notice.
d. Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. e. Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court while dealing with similar controversy has
passed order dated 25.11.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.22577/2025 (Sita Ram vs. Bank of Baroda and Ors.). He
prays that the present writ petition may also be disposed of in the
same terms as the said writ petition.
3. In view of the submissions made above, the present writ
petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Bank to
keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred
illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the
petitioner to make transactions from his bank account from the
remaining balance.
4. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent - Bank
has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the
disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to
be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication
to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the
amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the
instant order.
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 06:18:28 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:5654] (3 of 3) [CW-2349/2026]
5. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned
Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise
the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within
a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the
respondent - Bank. The respondent - Bank shall thereafter do the
needful as directed herein above. It is further made clear that in
case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the
concerned Investigating Officer/Police within the stipulated period,
then it shall de-freeze the bank account of petitioner.
6. Stay petition as well as all pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUNIL BENIWAL),J 250-AbhishekK/-
(Uploaded on 30/01/2026 at 06:18:28 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!