Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5650 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:16765]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7772/2026
Mukesh Gurjar S/o Richhpal Gurjar, Aged About 34 Years,
Resident Of Village Dewra, Tehsil Ladnun, District Deedwana
Kuchaman (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
Punjab National Bank Ltd., Through Branch Manager Nechhwa
Dist. Sikar. Ifsc Code Punb0270100.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhola Ram Chahar
For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
10/04/2026
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following
reliefs:-
(i) The respondent bank, Punjab National bank Ltd. situated at City Nechhwa District sikar. May kindly be directed to complete the investigation from the petitioner (if required) and allow the petitioner to operate his bank account on provisional basis without any interruption.
(ii) The respondent bank may be directed to de-freeze the saving bank account No. 1729000400507786 and allow the petitioner to operate his account and permitted to him to use his own amount deposited in the bank.
(iii) The respondents may be directed to pay compensation at least Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one Lakh) to the petitioner on account of the hardships being suffered by the petitioner due to non-operation of his bank account for the period by which his account freeze.
(iv) Any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be passed in favor of the petitioner"
2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,
this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition
with a direction to the Punjab National Bank Ltd. (Respondent) to
(Uploaded on 10/04/2026 at 02:41:51 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:16765] (2 of 2) [CW-7772/2026]
keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred
illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the
petitioner to make transactions from his bank account from the
remaining balance.
3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent - Bank
has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the
disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to
be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication
to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the
amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the
instant order.
4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned
Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise
the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within
a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the
respondent - Bank. The respondent - bank shall thereafter do the
needful as directed herein above.
5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank
does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating
Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance
with the instant order.
6. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand
disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 22-Sonia/-
(Uploaded on 10/04/2026 at 02:41:51 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!