Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 13815 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 September, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:43085]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17592/2025
Lokesh Kumar Garg S/o Ranchod Garg, Aged About 40 Years, R/
o Agarpura Colony, Banswara, District Banswara (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
(Panchayati Raj), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Additonal Commissioner, Rural Development And
Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Banswara,
Rajasthan.
4. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Garhi, District
Banswara, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
25/09/2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed aggrieved of notice
dated 14.08.2025 (Annexure-13) whereby the petitioner has been
called upon to explain as to why the departmental proceedings be
not initiated against him.
2. The issue for which the notice has been served on the
petitioner is that his educational as well as technical qualification
is/was not in accordance with the requisite qualification.
3. Admittedly, a reply to the notice has been filed by the
petitioner whereby all the grounds have been raised by him
(Uploaded on 25/09/2025 at 04:22:57 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:43085] (2 of 2) [CW-17592/2025]
including that both the issues have already been settled by the
judgment of this Court passed in a bunch of writ petitions led by
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15498/2025; Lakshmi Kumari Acharya
vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (decided on 19.08.2025) and
judgment of this Court at Jaipur Bench passed in a bunch of writ
petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1457/2021; Jahida
Salma vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (decided on 10.02.2022).
4. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to interfere at
this stage.
5. As a reply has already been filed by the petitioner, the
respondent authorities shall be under an obligation to consider the
said reply and thereupon passed a speaking order.
6. Needless to observe that if any order is passed against the
petitioner, he would be at liberty to file afresh.
7. With the above directions, the present writ petition stands
disposed of.
8. Stay petition and pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(REKHA BORANA),J 1-Devanshi/-
(Uploaded on 25/09/2025 at 04:22:57 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!