Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sameer Kha Alias Mada vs State Of Rajasthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 13542 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 13542 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 September, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Sameer Kha Alias Mada vs State Of Rajasthan on 20 September, 2025

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
              S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2238/2025

Sameer Khan Alias Mada S/o Shri Shergul Alias Kalu Khan, Aged
About 24 Years, R/o Kanora, Police Station- Rathanjana, District-
Pratapgarh, Rajasthan.
(Presently Lodged In District Jail Pratapgarh)
                                                                  ----Appellant
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
                                                                ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. Shiv Singh for
                               Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
                               Mr. OP Choudhary



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

20/09/2025

IN S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2238/2025:-

1. Admit.

2. Call for the record.

IN S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application for Suspension of

Sentence No.1755/2025:-

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned

Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the quantity

of narcotic substance recovered was below commercial quantity.

He further raises the ground regarding the compliance of the

mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act, 1985. He further submits

that there are no criminal antecedents and the appellant was on

bail during the course of trial. He asserts that the conviction

(Uploaded on 20/09/2025 at 03:43:10 PM)

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-2238/2025]

imposed is 2 years rigorous imprisonment only. He thus prays for

allowing of application for suspension of sentence.

3. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor opposes the

application for suspension of sentence and submits that the

learned Trial Court has considered each and every aspect of the

matter and after compliance of provisions of the NDPS Act, 1985,

the conviction order has been passed, and therefore, the accused-

appellant is not entitled for any indulgence whatsoever.

4. Upon consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of

the appellant and having regard to the facts and circumstances of

the case, including the facts that the recovered contraband is

below commercial quantity, there are no criminal antecedents, the

conviction imposed is 2 years rigorous imprisonment, the

appellant was on bail during the course of trial and there is no

chance of hearing of the present appeal in near future, this Court

is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence

awarded to the accused appellant.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 of Cr.P.C./ Section 430 of BNSS, 2023 is

allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned

Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Pratapgarh, vide judgment dated

09.09.2025 in Special Session Case No. 20/2020 against the

applicant Sameer Khan Alias Mada S/o Shri Shergul Alias Kalu

Khan shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid

appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he executes a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of

Rs.1,00,000/-, each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge

for his appearance in this court on 27.10.2025 and whenever

(Uploaded on 20/09/2025 at 03:43:10 PM)

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-2238/2025]

ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions

indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does/do not appear before the

trial Court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the

High Court for cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J 184-charul/-

(Uploaded on 20/09/2025 at 03:43:10 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter