Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 13392 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:41599-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17284/2025
Smt. Basanti Kela W/o Shri Mool Chand Kela, Aged About 55
Years, Resident Of 776, Bhojavato Ka Bas, Soorsagar, Jodhpur -
342024 (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Income-Tax Officer, Ward 3 (1), Jodhpur, Aayakar
Bhawan, Paota C Road, Jodhpur (Rajasthan) - 342010 E-
[email protected]
2. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range 3,
Jodhpur Office Of Income-Tax Department, Aayakar
Bhawan, Paota C Road Jodhpur (Rajasthan) - 342010
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sharad Kothari
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sunil Bhandari
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.R. SHRIRAM
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order
17/09/2025
1. Mr. Bhandari, who appears on advance copy, agrees with Mr.
Kothari that one of the grounds raised is certainly covered by a
judgment of this Court.
2. Ground referred to is that the notice dated 13.06.2025 under
Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been issued by a
Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) and not Faceless Assessing
Officer (FAO) and this Court in the case of Shree Cement
Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax &
Others1 following Sharda Devi Chhajer Vs. The Income Tax
1 DB Civil Writ Petition No.10540/2024, dated 05.08.2025 at Jaipur Bench (unreported)
(Uploaded on 19/09/2025 at 11:57:17 AM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41599-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-17284/2025]
Officer & Another2 and Hexaware Technologies Ltd. Vs.
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 15(1)(2) 3, has
held that such a notice will be bad and not valid.
3. At the same time, Mr. Bhandari states that in Hexaware
Technologies Ltd. (supra), Revenue has preferred a Special Leave
Petition and notice has been issued. Counsel states that in view of
the law as it stands today, Court may grant the prayer of
petitioner but in case the Apex Court interferes with judgment in
Hexaware Technologies Ltd. (supra), Sharda Devi Chhajer (supra)
or Shree Cement Limited (supra), then Revenue should be given
liberty to revive the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act.
4. Mr. Kothari states that in view of the above, for the present,
petitioner will reserve his right to raise other grounds at an
appropriate stage.
5. Therefore, keeping open all rights and contentions of parties,
we quash and set aside notice dated 13.06.2025 issued under
Section 148 of the Act with liberty as prayed.
6. Petition disposed.
7. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, also stand
disposed.
8. In case, if any re-assessment order is passed, the same will
also stand quashed and set aside.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J (K.R. SHRIRAM),CJ
3-a.asopa/-
2 2025 SCC OnLine 3386
3 [2024] 162 taxmann.com 225(Bombay)
(Uploaded on 19/09/2025 at 11:57:17 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!