Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 13151 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1037/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department
Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Director Non Gazetted, Medical And Health Services Cum
Additional Director Adm. Panchayati Raj Medical
Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur
3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh,
District Hanumangarh.
4. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural
Development And Panchayati Raj, Government
Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur
----Appellants
Versus
Radha Kumari D/o Om Prakash, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward
No. 11, Parlika, 20 Ntr, District Hanumangarh (Raj.). Presently
Working As Anm At Primary Health Center, Parlika, District
Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
Connected With
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1032/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department
Of Medical And Health, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director Non Gazetted, Medical And Health Services And
Additional Director Administration Panchayati Raj Medical
Department, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Ratangarh, District
Churu.
4. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Ratangarh, District
Churu.
5. Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development
And Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan Jaipur.
----Appellants
Versus
Kaushalya W/o Shri Subhash Chandra, Aged About 41 Years,
Resident Of Beeramsar, Churu, At Present Posted As Anm At Phc
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2025 at 09:58:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (2 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
Tidiyasar, Ratangarh, Churu.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1047/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department
Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Director Non Gazetted, Medical And Health Services Cum
Additional Director Admn., Panchayati Raj Medical
Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur
3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh,
District Hanumangarh.
4. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural
Development And Panchayati Raj, Government
Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Appellants
Versus
Kavita Devi W/o Ravidutt, Aged About 34 Years, R/o. Ward No.
04, Village Ramgarh , 16 Dpn, Tehsil Nohar, District
Hanumangarh Raj. Presently Working As Anm At Community
Health Centre, Ramgarh, District Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1057/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development
And Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan Jaipur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Hanumangarh.
4. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services And
Additional Director (Administration) Panchayati Raj
(Medical) Department, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh.
6. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nohar, District
Hanumangarh.
----Appellants
Versus
Saroj Devi D/o Shri Bhud Ram, Aged About 34 Years, Resident
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2025 at 09:58:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (3 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
Of Ratanpura, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh At Present
Posted As Anm At Phc Jasana, Tehsil Nohar, District
Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1060/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural And
Panchayati Raj, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Hanumangarh.
4. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services And
Addl. Director (Admn.), Panchayati Raj (Medical)
Department, Rajasthan Jaipur.
5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh.
6. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nohar, District
Hanumangarh.
----Appellants
Versus
Satrupa D/o Shri Santlal W/o Krishan Kumar, Aged About 40
Years, Resident Of Vpo Ajeetpura, Tehsil Bhadra District
Hanumangarh. At Present Working As A.n.m. Posted At Chc
Fefana, Block Nohar District Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1064/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Medical And Health, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services And
Additional Director (Administration), Panchayat Raj
(Medical) Department, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jalore, District Jalore.
4. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Ahore, District
Jalore.
5. Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development
And Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Appellants
Versus
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2025 at 09:58:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (4 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
Bhanwar Singh Rathore S/o Late Shree Jabbar Singh, Aged
About 42 Years, R/o Village Narnadi, Tehsil Luni, District Jodhpur
At Present Working At Ahore, District Jalore, Rajasthan.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1079/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical And
Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services,
Government Of Rajasthan Health Bhawan, Jaipur.
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jodhpur.
4. Zila Parishad Jodhpur, Through Its Chief Executive Officer.
5. Block Chief Medical Officer, Mandore, District Jodhpur.
----Appellants
Versus
Ramesh Gurjar S/o Shri Anna Ram, Aged About 29 Years, Village
/ Post Harsolav, Tehsil Merta City, District Jodhpur (Raj.)
Presently Posted Under Bcmo Office Mandore, District Jodhpur.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1089/2022
1. The State Of Rajasthan To The Secretary, Department Of
Medical And Health, Govt. Of Rajasthan Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. The Director (Non Gazzeted), Medical And Health Service
And Additional Director (Administration), Panchayati Raj
(Medical) Department, Rajasthan Jaipur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Nagaur.
4. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nagaur, District
Nagaur.
----Appellants
Versus
Mukesh Ola W/o Shri Vijendra Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o
Village Post Ghardana Kalan, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu
(Raj.).
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1095/2022
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2025 at 09:58:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (5 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services
Cum Additional Director (Admn.), Panchayati Raj
(Medical) Department, Rajasthan Jaipur.
3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh,
District Hanumangarh.
4. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural
Development And Panchayati Raj, Government
Secretariat, Rajasthan Jaipur.
----Appellants
Versus
Kulvinder Jeet Kour W/o Pramjeet Singh, Aged About 57 Years,
R/o Ward No. 5, Gogameri, 5 Ggm, District Hanumangarh (Raj.),
Presently Working As Anm At Primary Health Center, Gogameri,
District Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1096/2022
1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of
Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural And
Panchayati Raj, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Churu.
4. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services And
Add. Director (Admn.), Panchayati Raj (Medical)
Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Ratangarh, District
Churu.
6. Block Chief Medical Officer, Churu District Churu.
----Appellants
Versus
Anita Kumari D/o Shri Dariya Singh Rahar, Aged About 32 Years,
Resident Of Village Bhuwadi, Tehsil Rajgarh District Churu. At
Present Working As A.n.m. Posted At Chc Prithvisar, Block Churu
District Churu.
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2025 at 09:58:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (6 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1109/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health
Services-Cum-Additional Director (Admn.), Panchayati Raj
(Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh,
District Hanumangarh.
4. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural
Development And Panchayati Raj, Government
Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Appellants
Versus
Sajjana Kumari W/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 31 Years,
Resident Of Ward No. 8, Ramgarh, District Hanumangarh Raj..
Presently Working As Anm At Sub Health Center, Barwali Nohar,
District Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1118/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development
And Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan Jaipur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Hanumangarh.
4. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services And
Additional Director (Administration) Panchayati Raj
(Medical) Department, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh.
6. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nohar, District
Hanumangarh.
----Appellants
Versus
Sona W/o Shri Dilip Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of
V.p.o. Lalaniya, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh At Present
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2025 at 09:58:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (7 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
Posted As Anm At Phc Birkali, Tehsil Nohar, District
Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1125/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical And
Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Director (Non Gazzattee), Medical And Health Services
And Additional Director (Administration), Panchayatiraj
(Medical) Department, Rajasthan Tilak Marg, Swasthya
Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Churu, District Churu
(Raj.).
4. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Block Ratangarh,
District Churu (Raj.).
----Appellants
Versus
Smt. Preetika Prajapat W/o Shri Deepak Chejara, Aged About 34
Years, Resident Of Chejaro Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 15, Bissau,
District Jhunjhunu (Raj.).
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1131/2022
1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Secretary, Medical And
Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services,
Government Of Rajasthan Health Bhawan, Jaipur.
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nagaur.
4. The Block Chief Medical Officer, Degana, District Nagaur.
5. The Medical Officer In Charge, Kitalsar, Block Degana,
Panchayat Samiti Degana, District Nagaur
6. The Panchayat Samiti Degana, District Nagaur Through
Its Block Development Officer.
----Appellants
Versus
Ramswaroop Kaswan S/o Shri Ramdayal, Aged About 46 Years,
Resident Of Mp Gali, Degana, Tehsil Degana, District Nagaur
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2025 at 09:58:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (8 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
(Raj.)
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 158/2023
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary
Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical, Health And Family
Welfare Services, Rajasthan Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak
Marg, Jaipur
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bhilwara
4. Block Chief Medical Officer, Jahajpur District Bhilwara.
5. Medical Officer Inchrage, Chc Jahajpur District Bhilwara
----Appellants
Versus
Ravindra Meena S/o Shri Ramsingh Meena, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Village Lohari Khurd, Post Lohari Kalan, Tehsil Jahajpur,
District Bhilwara Presently Working On The Post Of Nurse Grade
Ii At Chc Jahajpur District Bhilwara.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 160/2023
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural Development
And Panchayati Raj, Rajasthan Jaipur.
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Hanumangarh.
4. Director (Non-Gazetted), Medical And Health Services And
Additional Director (Administration) Panchayati Raj
(Medical) Department, Tilak Marg, Jaipur.
5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh.
6. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nohar, District
Hanumangarh.
----Appellants
Versus
Krishna Jal W/o Shri Sunil Kumar, Aged About 35 Years, Resident
Of Phc Topariya, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh At Present
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2025 at 09:58:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (9 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
Posted As Anm At Phc Topariya, Tehsil Nohar, District
Hanumangarh.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 162/2023
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary
Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical, Health And Family
Welfare Services, Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak
Marg, Jaipur.
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bhilwara.
4. Block Chief Medical Officer, Jahajpur District Bhilwara.
5. Medical Officer Incharge, Chc Jahajpur District Bhilwara
----Appellants
Versus
Harishankar Regar S/o Shri Kailash Chand Regar, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Ambedkar Colony, Ward No. 2 Jahajpur, District
Bhilwara Presently Working On The Post Of Nurse Grade-Ii At
Chc Jahajpur District Bhilwara.
----Respondent
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 240/2023
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural And Panchayati
Raj, Govt. Of Rajasthan Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Hanumangarh.
4. Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services And
Add. Director (Admn.), Panchayati Raj (Medical)
Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
5. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh
6. Block Chief Medical And Health Officer, Rawatsar, District
Hanumangarh
----Appellants
Versus
Maya Devi D/o Shri Kashi Ram, Aged About 29 Years, Resident
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
(Downloaded on 16/09/2025 at 09:58:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (10 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
Of Chhoti Gandhi, Tehsil Bhadra District Hanumangarh. At
Present Working As A.n.m. Posted At Phc Baramsar, District
Hanumangarh
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, AAG
Mr. Bharat Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Order
15/09/2025
1. Learned Additional Advocate General Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit has
referred to the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of this
Hon'ble Court in D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No.315/2025 (Poonama
Ram Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. ; decided on
20.02.2025).
2. The operative portion of the aforesaid judgment is
reproduced as under :
"7. Once, it has been held that ex post facto sanction is permissible, challenge to the transfer order on the ground that consent was not obtained, is not tenable and liable to be rejected.
8. We also find that the learned Single Judge has issued a direction to the State to complete the process of grant of sanction within a period of 30 days.
9. But for the aforesaid direction, we would have considered this aspect as to whether even if it is permissible to grant ex post facto sanction, is it permissible to delay such ex post facto consent for indefinite period.
10. We concur with the view taken by the learned Single Judge that even in such case of ex post facto consent, the same is required to be completed within a reasonable period and it cannot be kept pending for an indefinite period.
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41024-DB] (11 of 11) [SAW-1037/2022]
11. In the present case, we are not inclined to say further on the aspects of statutory violation because the learned Single Judge has directed the exercise of ex post facto consent to be completed within a period of one month.
12. The ground of personal difficulties raised in this appeal is matter of consideration by the competent authority. The appellant may prefer a representation within a period of three weeks which may be considered and decided by the competent authority.
13. The appeal is disposed off accordingly.
14. Stay petition also stands disposed off."
3. Learned Additional Advocate General fairly submits that in
the light of the aforesaid directions, liberty be given to pass fresh
orders, in case need arises.
4. On such limited submission, the appeals are disposed of
while giving liberty to the State to pass fresh transfer orders while
adhering to the aforesaid directions given in the decision.
5. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 30, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40 to 50 & 51 /AnilKC/-
(Uploaded on 16/09/2025 at 10:53:17 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!