Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhagirath Menariya vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:40223)
2025 Latest Caselaw 12988 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 12988 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 September, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Bhagirath Menariya vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:40223) on 10 September, 2025

Author: Nupur Bhati
Bench: Nupur Bhati
[2025:RJ-JD:40223]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16226/2025

1.       Bhagirath Menariya S/o Hemraj Menariya, Aged About 40
         Years, R/o Vpo Chorwari, Tehsil Bhupalsagar, District
         Chittorgarh.
2.       Laxmi Lal Sen S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o
         Vpo Thobawara, Post Upreta, Tehsil Jhadol, District
         Udaipur.
3.       Mamta, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vijay Nai Ka Bass,
         Raghunathpura, Derwala, District Jhunjhunu.
4.       Sunita Meena D/o Ram Singh Meena, Aged About 34
         Years, R/o Shivaji, 57, Meena Mohalla, Shyopura, District
         Bharatpur.
5.       Nirmala Kumari D/o Rohitashwa, Aged About 34 Years, R/
         o C/o Anand Kumar Luniya, Bhainsawat Kalan, District
         Jhunjhunu.
6.       Sapna Verma D/o Banwari Lal Verma, Aged About 34
         Years, R/o C/o Khem Raj Bhatia, Sarelia (295),
         Mahendragarh (Haryana).
7.       Anil Patidar S/o Goutam Lal Patidar, Aged About 49 Years,
         R/o Shiv Mandir Ke Samne, Vpo Kanba, Tehsil Bichhiwara,
         District Dungarpur.
8.       Narayan Lal Gayri S/o Nathu Ji Gayri, Aged About 40
         Years, R/o 01, Upla Kheda, Sukhwada, Post Boyna, Tehsil
         Mavali, Dist - Udaipur.
9.       Rajesh Kumar S/o Ramniwas Yadav, Aged About 48 Years,
         R/o Vpo Godoj, Tehsil Bheror, District Alwar.
10.      Hosiyar Singh S/o Peetam Chand, Aged About 48 Years,
         R/o Ranmalpara, Vpo Thighana, Tehsil Todabhim, District
         Karauli.
                                                                 ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
         Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
         (Panchayati Raj), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,
         Rajasthan.
2.       Additional Commissioner, Rural Development And
         Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
         Jaipur.
3.       District Programme Coordinator And District Collector,


                      (Uploaded on 10/09/2025 at 05:35:35 PM)
                     (Downloaded on 10/09/2025 at 06:40:40 PM)
 [2025:RJ-JD:40223]                        (2 of 3)                         [CW-16226/2025]


         Jalore, Rajasthan.
4.       Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jalore, Rajasthan.
5.       Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sarnau, District
         Jalore, Rajasthan.
                                                                       ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Pawan Singh
                                     Mr. Mahendra Kumar Gurjar


         HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order 10/09/2025

1. Petition herein arises, inter alia, out of the inaction on the

part of the respondents in not according the correct service and

notional benefits to the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset submits that

qua the aforesaid grievance, the petitioners may be granted

liberty to file a fresh representation before the competent

authority and the same be decided by passing appropriate

administrative orders, in accordance with law.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners also relies on

order/judgment in Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. v. The State

of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.12109/2018, decided on 18.07.2018 at Jaipur Bench and

submits that the respondents may be directed to consider the

representation of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid

judgment.

4. Request seems to be fair.

5. Given the nature of order which is being passed, no

prejudice would be caused to the respondents and, therefore, the

requirement of issuance of notice is dispensed with as no return is

required to be filed by them.

(Uploaded on 10/09/2025 at 05:35:35 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:40223] (3 of 3) [CW-16226/2025]

6. In the aforesaid premise, the writ petition is disposed of with

a liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation, which

shall be gone into by the competent authority and appropriate

administrative order shall be passed in accordance with law.

7. Needless to say that the competent authority shall go

through the judgment relied upon by learned counsel for the

petitioners as mentioned hereinabove and apply its independent

mind on the applicability of the same before passing any order.

8. Needful be done as expeditiously as possible.

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J

277-/Devesh/-

(Uploaded on 10/09/2025 at 05:35:35 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter