Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 12588 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:38931]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15209/2025
Jetha Ram S/o Mohan Ram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No.
7, Ganesh Nagar, Chimana, District Phalodi Rajasthan 342311
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary,
Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The District Collector, Phalodi, Rajasthan.
3. The Sub Divisional Officer, District Phalodi, Rajasthan.
4. Tehsildar, Ghantiyali, District Phalodi.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Laxmi Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Rajpurohit, AAG
Mr. Sher Singh Rathore
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
01/09/2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
petitioner would be satisfied if the Secretary, Department of
Revenue (Group-I) is directed to expeditiously decide pending
representation(s) of the petitioners after taking into consideration
the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Moola Ram
Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.3470/2025), decided on 18.02.2025 as well as the new
circular issued by the State Government on the subject governing
the field.
2. The writ petition is therefore, disposed of with a direction to
the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the concerned
[2025:RJ-JD:38931] (2 of 2) [CW-15209/2025]
Secretary alongwith the photocopy of the earlier representation(s)
and the certified copy of the order instant within a period of four
weeks.
3. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid
period, the concerned Secretary shall expeditiously decide the
representations of the parties, in accordance with law, preferably
within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving the
representations. The authority shall take into consideration the
law laid down by this Court in case of Moola Ram (Supra) as well
as new Circular issued by the State Government on the subject
governing the field.
4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
representation has been issued only with a view to ensure
expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievances. The same may not
be construed to be an order to decide the representations in a
particular manner.
5. Stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 10-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!