Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16077 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:50997]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3432/2025
1. Smt Rachana W/o Sukha Ram, Aged About 24 Years, D/o
Jeta Ram R/o Jaleli Nayala Ps Dangiyawas Jodhpur At
Present 475 Jat Beniwalo Ki Dhaniyan Nausar Tehsil Osian
Jodhpur
2. Sukha Ram S/o Shri Mangi Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
475 Jat Beniwalo Ki Dhaniyan Nausar Tehsil Osian
Jodhpur
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur Metro
3. Superitendent Of Police, Jodhpur Rural
4. Sho Police Station, Dangiyawas District Jodhpur
5. Sho Police Station Banar, District Jodhpur
6. Sho Police Station Balesar, Distirict Jodhpur Rural
7. Sho Police Station Osiya District, Jodhpur Rural
8. Jeta Ram S/o Kanwara Ram, R/o Jaleli Nayala Ps
Dangiyawas Jodhpur
9. Dhokal Ram S/o Kanwara Ram, R/o Jaleli Nayala Ps
Dangiyawas Jodhpur
10. Dinesh S/o Duokal Ram, R/o Jaleli Nayala Ps Dangiyawas
Jodhpur
11. Kaviya D/o Dhokal Ram, R/o Jaleli Nayala Ps Dangiyawas
Jodhpur
12. Muni D/o Dhokal Ram, R/o Jaleli Nayala Ps Dangiyawas
Jodhpur
13. Dhanki D/o Dhokal Ram, R/o Jaleli Nayala Ps Dangiyawas
Jodhpur
14. Jamana Devi W/o Jeta Ram, R/o Jaleli Nayala Ps
Dangiyawas Jodhpur
15. Priyanka W/o Prakash, R/o Village Daikada Ps Banar Distt
Jodhpur
16. Indra W/o Kailash, R/o Village Daikada Ps Banar Distt
Jodhpur
(Uploaded on 26/11/2025 at 01:27:26 PM)
(Downloaded on 26/11/2025 at 03:37:10 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:50997] (2 of 3) [CRLW-3432/2025]
17. Nikita W/o Sunil, Datiwada Ps Dangiyawas District
Jodhpur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Choudhary
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hathi Singh Jodha, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
25/11/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned
respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with
adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so
far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners
for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide
protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
(Uploaded on 26/11/2025 at 01:27:26 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:50997] (3 of 3) [CRLW-3432/2025]
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 543-divya/-
(Uploaded on 26/11/2025 at 01:27:26 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!