Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Madan Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:49847)
2025 Latest Caselaw 15635 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15635 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Madan Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:49847) on 18 November, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:49847]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                No. 1845/2025

Madan Singh S/o Shri Mohan Singh, Aged About 61 Years, R/o
Village    Chamunderi,         P.s.   Nana,      Tehsil      Bali,   District   Pali
(Rajasthan) (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur)
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                      Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Shambhoo Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Narendra Chandawat, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

18/11/2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant as well as

learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on

record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that

there is an allegation of causing injuries by use of a lathi, and

total four injuries were sustained by the injured-deceased Lungi

Kanwar. It is further submitted that although one of the injuries

was on a vital body part, the same was simple in nature and the

only grievous injury found was a fracture in left sided rib No.8 & 9

of the right radius bone. Counsel further submits that the

appellant and the complainant are members of the same family

and the incident arose out of a dispute regarding a mobile phone

allegedly being snatched by the applicant. It is also submitted that

the appellant-applicant was on bail during the course of trial and

(Uploaded on 18/11/2025 at 05:28:45 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:49847] (2 of 3) [SOSA-1845/2025]

that there is no likelihood of the appeal being heard in the near

future. In these circumstances, learned counsel prays that the

appellant-applicant be released on bail by allowing the suspension

of sentence application.

3. Per Contra, Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the

application for suspension of sentence and submits the learned

Trial Court has rightly convicted the appellant-applicant for the

offences in question, and therefore, the application in question

deserves to be dismissed.

4. I have heard the arguments advanced on behalf of both the

sides and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

case, including the facts that the appellant-applicant was on bail

during the course of trial, one of the injuries was on a vital body

part, the same was simple in nature, as also, chances of hearing

of the appeal in near future being bleak, this Court is of the

opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to

the accused appellant-applicant.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section Section 430 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that

the sentence passed by the learned Additonal Sessions Judge,

Bali, District Pali vide judgment dated 15.09.2025 in Sessions

Case No.46/2013 (CIS No.185/2014), against the appellant-

applicant Madan Singh S/o Shri Mohan Singh, shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be

released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

(Uploaded on 18/11/2025 at 05:28:45 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:49847] (3 of 3) [SOSA-1845/2025]

court on 17.12.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the appellant-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

appellant-applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order

shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

said appellant-applicant does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J 51-mohit/-

(Uploaded on 18/11/2025 at 05:28:45 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter