Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rai Singh vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 15437 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15437 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Rai Singh vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 13 November, 2025

Author: Manoj Kumar Garg
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg
[2025:RJ-JD:48876-DB]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                  No. 2121/2025

Rai Singh S/o Shri Nahar Singh, Aged About 40 Years, Resident
Of Madrecho Ka Guda, Khamnor Police Station, Distt Rajsamand.
(Confined In Central Jail, Udaipur)
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                       Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                    ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. JVS Deora
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Rajesh Bhati, PP


          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/11/2025

1. The appellant-applicant herein has been convicted and

sentenced as below vide judgment dated 25.03.2021 passed by

the learned Sessions Judge, District Rajsamand in Sessions Case

No.59/219 (C.I.S. No.98/2019) :

      Offence                    Sentence                Fine        Sentence in
                                                                    default of fine
Section 302 IPC            Life                        Rs.300/-       1 year R.I.
                          Imprisonment

2. The appellant-applicant has preferred the application for

suspension of sentence under Section 430 B.N.S.S./389 Cr.P.C. for

suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal and for

release on bail.

3. The sole plea raised by learned counsel for the appellant-

applicant is that the appellant has been in judicial custody since

31.5.2018. Given that the hearing of the appeal is likely to be

(Uploaded on 13/11/2025 at 05:45:45 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:48876-DB] (2 of 3) [SOSA-2121/2025]

protracted, thus, the sentence of the applicant be suspended and

he be enlarged on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application for

suspension of sentence with the submission that as the appellant-

applicant has committed heinous offence, suspension of sentence

of such offenders would send adverse message in the society.

5. We have considered the submissions made by learned

counsel for the parties and perused the material available on

record.

6. Looking to the fact that criminal appeals pertaining to year

2008 also are pending for hearing, there is no likelihood of hearing

of the present appeal in near future.

7. In the present case as observed herein-before, the appellant-

applicant has been in judicial custody since 31.05.2018 and

apparently, there are no chances of hearing of the present appeal

in near future. Except for the fact that the appellants-applicants

were involved in offence leading to their conviction for life, nothing

has been brought on record by way of extenuating circumstances

for denial of suspension of sentence.

8. Consequently, without making any observations on merits of

the case, we are inclined to suspend the substantive sentence of

the appellant-applicant - Rai Singh S/o Shri Nahar Singh, during

the pendency of the appeal.

9. Accordingly, the instant application for suspension of

sentence filed under Section 430 B.N.S.S./389 Cr.P.C. is allowed

and it is ordered that substantive sentence passed by the learned

Sessions Judge, District Rajsamand in Sessions Case No.59/2019

(Uploaded on 13/11/2025 at 05:45:45 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:48876-DB] (3 of 3) [SOSA-2121/2025]

(C.I.S. No.98/2019) against the appellant-applicant - Rai Singh

S/o Shri Nahar Singh, shall remain suspended till final disposal

of the aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to

the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

court on 15.12.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:

1. That he will appear before the trial court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant change the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s) they will give in writing their changed address to the trial court.

10. The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case relating to original case in which the accused-

applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not been taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of the cases in the trial court. In case, the

said accused-applicants do not appear before the trial court,

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J (MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 123-amit/-

(Uploaded on 13/11/2025 at 05:45:45 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter