Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manish Galhotra vs State Of Rajasthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 15014 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15014 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Manish Galhotra vs State Of Rajasthan on 7 November, 2025

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
              S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2538/2025

1.        Manish Galhotra S/o Gurdas Ray, Aged About 47 Years,
          R/o 78- E Block, Sri Ganganagar, District Sri Ganganagar.
          (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar)
2.        Gurdas Rai Galhotra S/o Karmchand Galhotra, Aged
          About 69 Years, R/o 78- E Block, Sri Ganganagar, District
          Sri Ganganagar.
                                                                  ----Appellants
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Harshit Yadav
                                Mr. Mahipal Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Shri Ram Choudhary, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

07/11/2025

IN S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2538/2025:-

1. Admit.

2. Call for record.

IN S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application for Suspension of

Sentence No.2064/2025:-

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants-applicants as well

as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on

record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants-applicants submits that

the recovery has not been proved and recovered cough syrup and

other medicines were purchased by the firm and therefore, there

was no question of making out of necessary ingredients of any

(Uploaded on 07/11/2025 at 05:06:08 PM)

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-2538/2025]

offence under the Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940. He further

submits that the appellants were on bail during the course of trial.

He, therefore, implores this Court to allow the present Suspension

of Sentence Application

3. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor opposes the

application for suspension of sentence and submits that the

learned Trial Court has considered each and every aspect of the

matter threadbare and thereafter the conviction order has been

passed, therefore, the accused-appellants are not entitled for any

indulgence whatsoever.

4. Upon consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of

both the sides and having regards to the facts and circumstances

of the case, including the facts that the sentence imposed is 1

year with simple imprisonment, various arguable points raised by

the appellants-applicants, and that the chances of hearing of the

appeal in near future being bleak, this Court deems it appropriate

to suspend the sentence awarded to the accused-appellants.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 430 BNSS (Old Provision Section 389 of Cr.P.C.) is

allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned

Session Judge, Sri Ganganagar, vide judgment dated 14.10.2025

in Sessions Case No.50/2019 (CIS No. 50/2019), against the

appellants-applicants Manish Galhotra S/o Gurdas Ray &

Gurdas Rai Galhotra S/o Karmchand Galhotra shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and they shall

be released on bail, provided each of them executes a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their

(Uploaded on 07/11/2025 at 05:06:08 PM)

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-2538/2025]

appearance in this court on 10.12.2025 and whenever ordered to

do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated

below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial Court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does/do not appear before the

trial Court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the

High Court for cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J 7-charul/-

(Uploaded on 07/11/2025 at 05:06:08 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter