Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 14751 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:47087]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21013/2025
Ankita Meena D/o Ramji Lal Meena W/o Suraj Bhan Meena, Aged
About 36 Years, Balaiyo Ka Mohalla, Niwana, Tehsil Chomu,
District Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
(Panchayati Raj), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Additional Commissioner, Rural Development And
Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
3. District Programme Coordinator And District Collector,
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Bikaner, Rajasthan.
5. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Panchu, District
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh a/w
Mr. Dilip Kumar.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Vaishnav, Govt. Counsel.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
Order
01/11/2025
1. Heard.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
the facts of the present writ petition are similar to the facts in
Keshar Singh Chauhan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No. 15624/2025, decided on 01.09.2025 by the co-
ordinate bench of this Court which, in turn, relied upon the
(Uploaded on 01/11/2025 at 05:05:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:47087] (2 of 3) [CW-21013/2025]
decision of the Jaipur Bench of this Court in Nand Kishore
Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No. 12109/2018, decided on 18.07.2018.
3. The order dated 01.09.2025 passed by the coordinate Bench
of this Court in Keshar singh Chauhan's case (supra) reads as
under:-
"1. Petition herein arises, inter alia, out of the action on the part of the respondents in not according the correct service and notional benefits to the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that qua the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner may be granted liberty to file a fresh representation before the competent authority and the same be decided by passing appropriate administrative orders, in accordance with law.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also relies on order/judgment in Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12109/2018, decided on 18.07.2018 at Jaipur Bench and submits that the respondents may be directed to consider the representation of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment.
4. Request seems to be fair.
5. Given the nature of order which is being passed, no prejudice would be caused to the respondents and, therefore, the requirement of issuance of notice is dispensed with as no return is required to be filed by them.
6. In the aforesaid premise, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representation, which shall be gone into by the
(Uploaded on 01/11/2025 at 05:05:34 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:47087] (3 of 3) [CW-21013/2025]
competent authority and appropriate administrative order shall be passed in accordance with law.
7. Needless to say that the competent authority shall go through the judgment relied upon by learned counsel for the petitioner as mentioned hereinabove and apply its independent mind on the applicability of the same before passing any order.
8. Needful be done as expeditiously as possible."
4. In light of the above, the present writ petition is also
disposed of in the same terms as in Keshar Singh Chauhan's
case (supra).
5. All the pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(MUNNURI LAXMAN),J 126-Mohan/-
(Uploaded on 01/11/2025 at 05:05:34 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!