Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lovedeep Kaur vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:26843)
2025 Latest Caselaw 1486 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1486 Raj
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Lovedeep Kaur vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:26843) on 5 June, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:26843]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1637/2025

1.       Lovedeep Kaur D/o Balwant Singh, Aged About 20 Years,
         Resident Of Ward No.9 Chak 21 Gg (20 Gg), Tehsil District
         Sriganganagar (Raj)
2.       Raj Kumar S/o Heera Lal, Aged About 28 Years, Resident
         Of Ward No. 8, Chak 21 Gg (20 Gg), Tehsil District
         Sriganganagar (Raj)
                                                                      ----Petitioners
                                       Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of
         Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj)
2.       The Superintendent Of Police, Sriganganagar (Raj)
3.       Station House Officer, Police Station Chunawad, District
         Sriganganagar (Raj)
4.       Balwant @ Banta Singh S/o Massa Singh, Resident Of
         Ward        No.9   Chak      21     Gg      (20     Gg),    Tehsil   District
         Sriganganagar (Raj)
5.       Kulwant Singh S/o Massa Singh, Resident Of Ward No.9
         Chak 21 Gg (20 Gg), Tehsil District Sriganganagar (Raj)
6.       Amritpal Singh S/o Jaswant Singh, Resident Of 21 Gg, Ps
         Chunawad, District Sriganganagar (Raj)
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Abhishek Aggarwal
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Pawan Kumar Bhati, PP



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH (VACATION JUDGE)

Order

05/06/2025

1. The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

[2025:RJ-JD:26843] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1637/2025]

2. The petitioners, both being major persons, claim to be in a

live-in relationship. They submit that they are living with each

other against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

threatened at the hands of respondent nos. 4 to 6.

3. Petitioners, who are major and willingly living in a

relationship without entering into marriage, also cannot be denied

protection of their life and liberty since it is a fundamental right of

every citizen being part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India,

as has been observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

S. Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal [(2010)5 SCC 600] and Joseph

Shine Vs. Union of India [(2019)3 SCC 39]. Thus, the petitioners

deserve protection of their life and liberty in accordance with law.

4. The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

live-in-relationship agreement have been filed on record. Thus,

taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P., reported in AIR

2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners for directing

the Superintendent of Police, Sri Ganganagar to provide protection

to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

5. This Court, in exercise of its writ jurisdiction, is not inclined

to enter into examining the validity of legality of the relationship

of the parties. Therefore, it does not render any affirmation of

legality and validity of the status of parties under which they are

living together. However, keeping in mind the propositions of law

set forth by the Apex Court in a catena of judgments and in order

to protect the fundamental rights of the parties for their life and

liberty guaranteed under the Constitution, this petition is disposed

[2025:RJ-JD:26843] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1637/2025]

of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Superintendent of

Police, Sri Ganganagar for ventilation of their grievances.

6. In case the petitioners move any application, it is expected

from the Superintendent of Police, Sri Ganganagar, to take

necessary action to ensure that no illegal hindrance is caused to

the peaceful life and liberty of the petitioners by private

respondents, who are not agreeable to their relationship, but only

after verifying the facts, if required.

7. The Superintendent of Police, Sri Ganganagar shall ensure

that no harm is caused to the petitioners, who are in a live-in

relationship.

8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the

civil/criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.

9. The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(SANDEEP SHAH (VACATION JUDGE)),J 122-Love/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter