Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satyanarayan Sattu vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27383)
2025 Latest Caselaw 10712 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10712 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 June, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Satyanarayan Sattu vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:27383) on 18 June, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:27383]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 S.B. Criminal Suspension of Sentence Application No.1118/2025
                                         in

               S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No.1328/2025

1.       Satyanarayan Sattu S/o Shri Nanalal Gujar, Aged About
         40 Years, R/o Rawat Ka Talab, Police Station Vijaypur,
         Dist. Chittorgarh. (Presently Lodged At District Jail,
         Chittorgarh)
2.       Balu Ram S/o Shri Kishana Gurjar, Aged About 55 Years,
         R/o Chandol, Police Station Ratangarh, Dist. Nimach
         (M.P.) (Presently Lodged At District Jail, Chittorgarh)
3.       Narayan Lal S/o Shri Kishana Gujar, Aged About 43 Years,
         R/o Chandol, Police Station Ratangarh, Dist. Nimach
         (M.P.) (Presently Lodged At District Jail, Chittorgarh)
4.       Kalu Ram S/o Shri Udai Ram Meghwal, Aged About 43
         Years, R/o Luhariya Jat, Police Station Ratangarh, Dist.
         Nimach      (M.P.)    (Presently         Lodged          At    District   Jail,
         Chittorgarh)
                                                                        ----Appellants
                                     Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
                                                                       ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)           :     Mr. Bhawani Singh
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Ravindra Singh, PP



     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI

(VACATION JUDGE)

Order

18/06/2025

This suspension of sentence application under Section 430 of

BNSS (U/s 389 Cr.P.C) has been filed against the judgment of

conviction and sentence dated 04.06.2025 passed by the learned

[2025:RJ-JD:27383] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-1328/2025]

Special Judge NDPS Cases No.1, Chittorgarh in Sessions Case

No.11/2011.

Learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appellants

were on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal is likely to

take a long time. Therefore, the sentence awarded to the

appellants may be suspended.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the prayer of the appellants.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case so

also the facts that the appeal preferred by the appellant against

the impugned judgment is not likely to be heard in near future, I

consider it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to

the accused appellants.

Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence

under Section 430 of BNSS (U/s 389 Cr.P.C) is allowed and it is

ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge

NDPS Cases No.1, Chittorgarh vide judgment dated 04.06.2025 in

Sessions Case No.11/2011 against accused-appellants (1)

Satyanarayan Sattu S/o Shri Nanalal Gujar, (2) Balu Ram

S/o Shri Kishana Gurjar, (3) Narayan Lal S/o Shri Kishana

Gujar and (4) Kalu Ram S/o Shri Udai Ram Meghwal, shall

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal subject

to depositing 100% of the fine amount. The appellants shall be

released on bail provided they execute a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in this

court on 21.07.2025 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

[2025:RJ-JD:27383] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-1328/2025]

1. That he/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the appellant changes the place of residence, he/they will give in writing his/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

4. The appellants shall deposit 100% of fine amount as imposed by the trial court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-appellants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order

shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

said accused-appellants does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),VJ 192-Hanuman/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter