Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1773 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:28620]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12229/2025
Prabhu Dayal Meena S/o Gara Ram Meena, Aged About 58 Years,
Vpo Birol, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
School Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
03/07/2025
1. The present writ petition has been filed aggrieved of transfer
order dated 12.04.2025 (Annexure-2) and further rejection of
representation of the petitioner vide order dated 19.06.2025
(Annexure-5).
2. Vide order dated 12.04.2025, the petitioner was transferred
from Birol, Nawalgarh, Jhunjhunu to Untwaliya, Jodhpur after
being promoted. However, he preferred a writ petition before this
Court being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8925/2025; Subhash
Chandra Nandwana & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
which stood disposed of vide order dated 01.05.2025 whereby the
respondents were directed to decide the representation of the
petitioners in terms of the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court in Poonma Ram vs. The State of
[2025:RJ-JD:28620] (2 of 2) [CW-12229/2025]
Rajasthan & Ors.; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8749/2025
(decided on 28.04.2025).
3. In pursuance to order dated 12.04.2025, the petitioner filed
his representation dated 07.05.2025 (Annexure-4) whereby he
requested to be continued at the same place of posting i.e. at Birol
Nawalgarh, Jhunjunu. The said representation stood rejected vide
order impugned dated 19.06.2025 (Annexure-5). While rejecting
the representation, the Authority concerned specifically observed
that the petitioner has been transferred to a place in the same
District and not to some other District.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
is due to retire in the month of July 2027 and hence, he ought not
to be transferred at the verge of his retirement.
5. This Court is of the clear opinion that the detailed reasons as
accorded by the authority while rejecting the representation are
totally legal and valid. No Government employee can, as a matter
of right, claim to be posted and continue at one place of posting
for his complete tenure. So far as the retirement of the petitioner
is concerned, the same is evidently after more than a period of
one year.
6. This Court is therefore not inclined to interfere in order
impugned dated 12.04.2025 (Annexure-2) and the writ petition is
hence, dismissed.
7. Stay petition and pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(REKHA BORANA),J 31-Devanshi/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!