Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gopal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28680)
2025 Latest Caselaw 1747 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1747 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Gopal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:28680) on 3 July, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:28680]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                  S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4876/2025

1.          Gopal S/o Shanker Lal Kumawat, Aged About 29 Years,
            Resident Of Surtai Bichor, P.s. Begun, Dist.- Chittorgarh.
2.          Prakash S/o Shri Mangilal Meena, Aged About 24 Years,
            Resident Of Amargarh Kachola, P.s. Shakkargarh, Dist.-
            Bhilwara.
3.          Narayan Lal S/o Shri Jassa Rebari,, Aged About 32 Years,
            Resident Of Rajgarh, P.s. Parsoli, Dist.- Chittorgarh
                                                                      ----Petitioners
                                       Versus
1.          State Of Rajasthan, Pp
2.          Shri Anupam Mishra S/o Shri Ashok Kumar Mishra, At
            Present Working As S.h.o., P.s. Begun, Dist.- Chittorgarh.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Swaroop Singh Sisodia
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Sri Ram Choudhary, PP



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

03/07/2025

1. By way of filing the present criminal misc. petition under

Section 528 BNSS, the petitioner has prayed for the following

reliefs:-

"It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this criminal misc. petition may kindly be allowed and the impugned FIR and further proceedings in pursuance of the FIR No.248/2023 and Chargesheet no.158/2023 registered at P.S. Begun, District Chittorgarh may kindly be quashed and set aside.

Any other relief which Hon'ble Court deems just and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners."

2. As per the impugned FIR, acting upon an information received

on 13.09.2023, the SHO, P.S. Begun, District Chittorgarh flagged

down one Pickup vehicle bearing registration No.RJ09-GC-6405.

[2025:RJ-JD:28680] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-4876/2025]

After conducting a search of the vehicle in question, the police team

found plastic drums filled with petroleum products. On being

enquired, the petitioner stated that he do not have any valid license

to possess/ transport the same. The drums filled with petroleum

products were seized on the spot. Thereafter, the impugned FIR for

aforesaid offences was registered.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset relies on

a judgment rendered by this Court in the case of "Karamjeet

Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan" S.B. Criminal Revision Petition

No.1361/2014 decided on 02.02.2016. The relevant portion of

which is extracted below:-

"These orders as well as the State Government's Control Order of 1990 have all been issued under Section 3 of the E.C. Act. They submit that the Central Government's Control Orders would have an over-riding effect on a Control order issued by the State Government as they all cover the same subject. They rely on the notification dated 10.04.2006 issued by the State Government under the Control Order, 2005 whereby, officers not below the rank of Additional DSO have been authorised to take action under the said Control Order. They further contend that under the Control Order of 1999, retail sale of petroleum products upto 2500 Ltrs. Is permissible to one person at a time."

4. Learned counsel submitted that since the petitioner was found

in possession of 2000 litres of petroleum products, no offence as

alleged in the FIR is made out against him. It was thus contended

that the competent authority has issued a notification dated

10.04.2006, permitting 2500 litres of petroleum products to be

transported by an individual. Moreover, the petroleum products

recovered in the present case are not covered under the definition

of Essential Commodities Act. He thus implored the Court to quash

and set aside the impugned FIR.

[2025:RJ-JD:28680] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-4876/2025]

5. Learned Public Prosecutor was not in a position to dispute the

ratio rendered in judgment Ibid, which has attained finality since it

has not challenged.

6. In view of aforesaid, the present criminal misc. petition is

allowed and the FIR No.248/2023, registered at Police Station

Begun, District Chittorgarh is quashed with consequences to follow.

7. All pending applications shall stand disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 63-divya/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter