Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Rajasthan vs Poonma Ram (2025:Rj-Jd:55199-Db)
2025 Latest Caselaw 17349 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 17349 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

State Of Rajasthan vs Poonma Ram (2025:Rj-Jd:55199-Db) on 19 December, 2025

Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati, Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:55199-DB]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                   D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 741/2025

1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of    Education,         Government            Of      Rajasthan,       Jaipur
         (Rajasthan).
2.       The Secretary, Department Of Rural Development And
         Panchayati       Raj,     Government             Of        Rajasthan,   Jaipur
         (Rajasthan).
3.       The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District
         Bikaner, Rajasthan
4.       The Joint Director (School Education), Pali Division,
         District Pali (Rajasthan).
5.       The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary
         Education, Jalore, District Jalore (Rajasthan).
6.       The Chief Block Education Officer, Block Jalore, District
         Jalore, Rajasthan
7.       The    Principal/peeo,            Government           Senior      Secondary
         School,    Sankarana,             Block       Jalore,        District   Jalore
         (Rajasthan).
                                                                        ----Appellants
                                       Versus
Poonma Ram S/o Shri Vela Ram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o
Village Ratanpura, Post Leta, Tehsil Aahore, District Jalore
(Rajasthan).
                                                                       ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)             :     Ms. Meenal Singhvi (through VC) for
                                   Mr. Rajesh Panwar, Sr. Adv. & AAG.
                                   Mr. Deepak Chandak, for
                                   Mr. B.L. Bhati, AAG.
For Respondent(s)            :     -----



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

                                     ORDER

19/12/2025

(Uploaded on 20/12/2025 at 01:09:48 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:55199-DB] (2 of 3) [SAW-741/2025]

1. The matter comes up on an application under Section 5 of

the Limitation Act seeking delay in filing the appeal.

2. Having considered the application and the reasons stated

therein, the application is allowed. The delay in filing the appeal is

hereby condoned.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the appellants, the

matter has been decided finally.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants-State fairly submit that

the controversy involved in the present appeal is no more res-

integra and it is covered by the decision rendered by a Coordinate

Bench of this Hon'ble Court at Jaipur Bench in State Of

Rajasthan & Ors. v. Dal Chand Jat (D.B. Special Appeal Writ

No. 293/2020) and other connected matters on 13.11.2025. The

relevant portion of the judgment reads as under:

"19. Thus, it is apparent that the law laid down by the Apex Court of not allowing recovery of excess payment made without any misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the employee is a law of equity. A person who is working with the State Government is not authorized to make his own pay fixations.

20. In the present case on account of wrongful interpretation at the hands of the concerned District Education Officer and the Account Officers, the pay fixations were done from the initial date of appointment without taking into consideration the probationer trainee period.

21. The writ petitioners, therefore, cannot be said to be at fault, hence, while we uphold the order passed by the State Government for making re-fixation done only after considering the probationer trainee period, we do not find it a case where we should allow the State to make recoveries from the teachers who are at the lowest rank of the services namely; on the post of Teacher Gr-III.

(Uploaded on 20/12/2025 at 01:09:48 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:55199-DB] (3 of 3) [SAW-741/2025]

22. Our view is also buttressed from the latest views taken by the Apex Court following the aforesaid judgment of "Thomas Daniel" (supra) and "Rafiq Masih (White Washer)" (supra) in the case of "Jogeswar Sahoo & Ors. vs. The District Judge, Cuttack & Ors.": 2025 INSC 449 and the earlier judgment of "Jagdish Prasad Singh Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.": 2024 INSC 591.

23. We, accordingly, modify the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge to the aforesaid extent. All the appeals are, accordingly, party allowed.

24. All pending applications stand disposed of.

25. A copy of this order be placed in each connected files."

5. In light of the aforequoted order, the present special appeal

is disposed of on the same terms. All pending applications, if any,

also stand disposed of.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

19-Zeeshan

(Uploaded on 20/12/2025 at 01:09:48 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter