Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 17269 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:55084]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3701/2025
1. Smt Manisha W/o Jasraj, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
Sandiya Pali Raj.
2. Jasraj S/o Sh Chitarmal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
Adarsh Colony, Bhesar Marg, Tinwari District Jodhpur.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Superintendent Of Police, Pali
3. Inspector General Of Police, Pali
4. Sho Police Station Chandawal, District Pali.
5. Sho Police Station Mathania, District Jodhpur
6. Ganpat Lal S/o Bhanwar Lal, R/o Sandiya District Pal
7. Laxmi W/o Ganpat Lal, R/o Sandiya Distt Pali
8. Kishan Lal S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident- Sandiya District
Pali
9. Shrawan Lal S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident- Sandiya District
Pali
10. Jagdish S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident- Sandiya District Pali
11. Vishnu S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident- Sandiya District Pali.
12. Ashok S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident- Sandiya District Pali
13. Mahaveer S/o Bhanwar Lal, Resident- Sandiya District Pali
14. Kamla Devi W/o Bhopal, Resident- Sandiya District Pali
15. Deepak S/o Ganpat Lal, Resident- Sandiya District Pali
16. Rahul S/o Ganpat Lal, Resident- Sandiya District Pali
17. Chitarmal Rav Alias Chotu Rav S/o Jagdish Prasad Rav, R/
o Adarsh Colony Bhesar Road, Tiwari District Jodhpur
18. Maina Devi W/o Chitar Mal Rav, R/o Adarsh Colony Bhesar
Road, Tiwari District Jodhpur
19. Amara Ram Alias Anesh Rav, R/o Adarsh Colony Bhesar
Road, Tiwari District Jodhpur
20. Ghanshyam Rav, R/o Adarsh Colony Bhesar Road, Tiwari
District Jodhpur
----Respondents
(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 05:45:16 PM)
(Downloaded on 18/12/2025 at 08:34:50 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:55084] (2 of 3) [CRLW-3701/2025]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Doulat Ram
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
18/12/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned
respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with
adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so
far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of
U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the
petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to
provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 05:45:16 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:55084] (3 of 3) [CRLW-3701/2025]
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 596-divyashri/-
(Uploaded on 18/12/2025 at 05:45:16 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!