Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bintu Alias Mintu vs State Of Rajasthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 16490 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16490 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 December, 2025

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Bintu Alias Mintu vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 December, 2025

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                            JODHPUR
S.B. Crl. Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.2328/2025
                                IN
             S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2753/2025

Bintu Alias Mintu S/o Shri Karan Singh, Aged About 34 Years,
Resident of Sorda Jadid, Police Station Bahal, District Bhiwani. At
Present Lodged In Sub Jail Taranagar, Dist. Churu)
                                                      ----Appellant
                              Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Learned P.P.
                                                   ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)             :     Mr. Prakash Choudhary
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. Sriram Choudhary, PP


               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL

Order 09/12/2025

S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 2753/2025:-

Admit.

Issue notice.

Call for the record.

S.B. Crl. Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.2328/2025:-

1. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

moved on behalf of the applicant-appellant against the judgment

and order dated 13.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional

District & Sessions Judge, Taranagar, District Churu in Sessions

Case No.34/2016 whereby the applicant-appellant was convicted

and sentenced to undergo a punishment of two years simple

imprisonment under Section 148/149 of the IPC and one year

simple imprisonment under Section 147/149 of the IPC.

2. It is contended on behalf of the applicant-appellant that the

learned trial Court has not appreciated the correct, legal and

(Uploaded on 09/12/2025 at 05:56:03 PM)

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-2753/2025]

factual aspects of the matter and thus, reached at an erroneous

conclusion of guilt, therefore, the same is required to be

appreciated again by this court being the first appellate Court.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that the

appellant-applicant was on bail during the course of the trial. It is

further contended that he has no previous criminal antecedents.

On the basis of these submissions, learned counsel submits that

the appellant-applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail by

suspending the sentence awarded to him.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the prayer made on behalf of the applicant-appellant for

suspension of sentence. It is therefore, prayed that the application

seeking suspension of sentence be dismissed.

5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

6. Considering the facts stated above, more particularly the fact

that the applicant-appellant has no previous criminal antecedents

and he was on bail during trial, so also that appeal is likely to take

considerable time to be finally decided, this Court is of the view

that without making any observation on the merits of the case,

this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the

sentence awarded to the accused-appellant.

7. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 430 BNSS (old section 389 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it

is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court

(Uploaded on 09/12/2025 at 05:56:03 PM)

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-2753/2025]

against the appellant-applicant- Bintu Alias Mintu S/o Shri

Karan Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he

executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Judge for his appearance in this court on 09.01.2026 and

whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-

(i). That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

(ii). That if the applicant-appellant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

(iii). Similarly, if the sureties change their addresses, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

8. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused applicant does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(SUNIL BENIWAL),J 85-Ashutosh/-

(Uploaded on 09/12/2025 at 05:56:03 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter