Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 12392 Raj
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:20610]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1161/2025
1. Mahima Goyal D/o Shri Chanderpal Goyal, Aged About 23
Years, R/o Chak 2, Pgm-B, Ward No. 4, Pgm-B, Po 70 Gb,
Dist. Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.
2. Maninder Singh S/o Harjinder Singh, Aged About 25
Years, R/o 6 K A, 6 P Po, Patroda, District Sriganganagar,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Police-State, Through Secretary Home Department
Government Of Rajasthan
2. Superintendent Of The Police, Sriganganagar Rajasthan
3. S.h.o., Police Station Kesharisinghpur District
Srigangangar Rajasthan
4. Chanderpal Goyal S/o Hemraj Goyal, R/o Chak 2, Pgm-B,
Ward No. 4, Pgm-B, Police Station Anupgarh, Dist.
Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.
5. Subhash Goyal S/o Chanderpal Goyal, R/o Chak 2, Pgm-
B, Ward No. 4, Pgm-B, Police Station Anupgarh, Dist.
Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.
6. Bindrpal Goyal S/o Hemraj Goyal, R/o Adarsh Colony
Anupgarh Police Station Anupgarh District Sriganganagar
Rajasthan
7. Suresh Bansal S/o Kapurchand, R/o 25 F Gulabewala
Police Station Kesharisinghpur District Srigangangar
Rajasthan
8. Vijay Bansal S/o Kapurchand, R/o 25 F Gulabwala Police
Station Kesharisinghpur District Sriganganagar Rajasthan
9. Harman S/o Vijay Bansal, R/o 25 F Gulabewala Police
Station Kesharisinghpur District Srigangangar Rajasthan
10. Punit S/o Vijay Bansal, R/o 25 F Gulabewala Police
Station Kesharisinghpur District Srigangangar Rajasthan
11. Nisha W/o Kapurchand, R/o 25 F Gulabewala Police
Station Kesharisinghpur District Srigangangar Rajasthan
----Respondents
(Downloaded on 28/04/2025 at 10:05:23 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:20610] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1161/2025]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gaur
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
28/04/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the
prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
[2025:RJ-JD:20610] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1161/2025]
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 251-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!