Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shivangi Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:19219)
2025 Latest Caselaw 12024 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 12024 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Shivangi Choudhary vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:19219) on 21 April, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:19219]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1060/2025

1.       Shivangi Choudhary Spouse/o Karan Godara, Aged About
         24 Years, D/o Shri Badri Narayan, Age- 24 Years,
         (05/06/2000) R/o Ward No 6 Kikarwali, 60 Rb,
         Raisinghnagar District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).
2.       Karan Godara S/o Shri Ranveer Godara, Aged About 30
         Years, (10/07/1994) R/o Ward No 04, 56 Rb,
         Raisinghnagar District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
         Department Of Home Ministry, Government Of Rajasthan,
         Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       Inspector General Of Police, Bikaner Range ,bikaner
3.       The Superintendent Of Police, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
4.       The Sho Police Station, Muklawa District Sri Ganganagar,
         Rajasthan.
5.       Badri Narayan S/o Harchand Sai, R/o Ward No 6
         Kikarwali, 60 Rb, Raisinghnagar , District Sri Ganganagar
         (Raj.).
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Ashok Kumar
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

21/04/2025

The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to have

performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was

performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are

their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned

[2025:RJ-JD:19219] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1060/2025]

respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with

adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so

far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed

on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners

for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide

protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 242-Dinesh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter