Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11867 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:18930]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1042/2025
1. Radha Kumari Gadri D/o Bhagirath Gadri, Aged About 19
Years, Dolaji Ka Khera Vtc Jeeta Was Po Potlajagur Sub
District Bhadesar District Chittorgarh At Present Reside At
Gadri Mohalla Geeta Kheda Po Mandfia District
Chittorgarh Rajasthan
2. Mithun Gadri S/o Ratan Lal Gardi, Aged About 20 Years,
Resident Of Gadri Mohalla Geeta Kheda P O Mandfia
District Chittorgarh Rajasthan
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary Ministry Of
Home Affairs Jaipur Rajasthan
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Chittorgarh Rajasthan
3. The Station House Officer, Police Station Mandfia District
Chittorgarh Rajasthan
4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Bhadesar District
Chittorgarh Rajasthan
5. Bhagirath Gadri S/o Hajari Gadri, Resident Of Dolaji Ka
Khera Vtc Jeeta Was Po Potlajagir Sub District Bhadesar
District Chittorgarh Rajasthan
6. Devi Lal S/o Bhagirath Gadri, Resident Of Dolaji Ka Khera
Vtc Jeeta Was Po Potlajagir Sub District Bhadesar District
Chittorgarh Rajasthan
7. Lehri Lal, Mavra Tehsil Bhadesar District Chittorgarh
Rajasthan
8. Ghasi Ram S/o Deva Ji, Mavra Tehsil Bhadesar District
Chittorgarh Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
[2025:RJ-JD:18930] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1042/2025]
17/04/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the
prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 258-himanshu/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!