Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11861 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:18913]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1028/2025
1. Gopa Ram S/o Varda Ram, Aged About 25 Years, Resident
Of Village Rebariyo Ka Bas Post Medanichala Tehsil Jalore
District Jalore Rajasthan
2. Leela Kumar D/o Ranga Ram, Aged About 18 Years,
Resident Of Rebariyo Ka Bas Post Kacholi Tehsil Sirohi
District Sirohi Rajasthan
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretariat Department Of
Home Affairs Jaipur
2. Superintendent Of Police, Sirohi
3. Superintendent Of Police, Jalore
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Swaroopganj District
Sirohi
5. Station House Officer, Police Station Jalore Dist Jalore
6. Ranga Ram S/o Nimba Ram, Resident Of Rebariyo Ka Bas
Post Kacholi Tehsil Sirohi District Sirohi Rajasthan
7. Prabhu S/o Ranga Ram, Resdient Of Rebariyo Ki Bas Post
Kacholi Tehsil Sirohi District Sirohi Rajasthan
8. Mona Ram S/o Babu Ram, Resident Of Rebario Ka Bas
Post Kacholi Tehsil Sirohi District Sirohi Rajasthan
9. Suresh S/o Sada Ram, Resdient Of Kivdali Tehsil Abu
Road District Sirohi Rajasthan
10. Amra Ram S/o Sada Ram, Resdient Of Kivdali Tehsil Abu
Raod District Sirohi Rajasthan
11. Raju S/o Sada Ram, Resdient Of Kivdali Tehsil Abu Road
District Sirohi Rajasthan
12. Satish S/o Amra Ram, Resdient Of Kivdali Tehsil Abu Road
District Sirohi Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O.P. Sangwa
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
(Downloaded on 17/04/2025 at 09:27:52 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:18913] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1028/2025]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
17/04/2025
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live
in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other
against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at
the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The
petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent
authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection
but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in
relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the
judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the
prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned
respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners
deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who are in a live in relationship.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
[2025:RJ-JD:18913] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1028/2025]
244-himanshu/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!