Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11534 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:18727]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 478/2024
Prakash S/o Labu Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Bagiyada
Tehsil Raipur Dist. Pali
----Appellant
Versus
Yadvendra Singh S/o Lokendra Singh, R/o Bansiya Tehsil Raipur
Dist. Pali
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ravindra Acharya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, DyGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
16/04/2025
1. The defect pointed out by the office is overlooked.
2. Heard on the application seeking condonation of delay. The
same is allowed for the reasons mentioned therein. The delay in
filing the leave to appeal is condoned.
3. Heard on the leave to appeal application.
4. In a prosecution launched by the petitioner against the
respondent for the commission of offence under Section 138 of
the N.I. Act, the learned trial court after full-fledged trial acquitted
the accused-respondent.
5. Upon perusal of the judgment impugned, it is revealing that
a cheque was allegedly given by the accused-respondent to the
petitioner, which upon presentation got dishonoured owing to
reason of "funds insufficient". There appears reasonable grounds
to allow the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned
judgment.
[2025:RJ-JD:18727] (2 of 2) [CRLLA-478/2024]
6. Accordingly, the instant application seeking leave to appeal is
allowed. The memo of leave to appeal application shall be treated
and registered as an appeal.
7. Office to proceed.
(FARJAND ALI),J 90-Pramod/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!