Patil Dimpal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:18300)
2025 Latest Caselaw 11378 Raj

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Patil Dimpal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:18300) on 9 April, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur

Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2025:RJ-JD:18300]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 960/2025

1.       Patil Dimpal D/o Shri Sudam, Aged About 22 Years, 43
         Bajrang     Nagar      Society       Damoli         Surat    City   Gujrat
         Presentaly Residence Bhakharo Ki Dhani Thob Teh Osian
         Dis Jodhpur
2.       Kana Ram S/o Ram Chandra, Aged About 24 Years,
         Bhakharo Ki Dhani Thob Teh Osiya Dis Jodhpur
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       The Sp, Surat, Gujrat
3.       The Sho, Ps Olpad, Dist. Surat, Gujrat
4.       Sudam Patil S/o Laxman Patil, 43 Bajrang Nagar Society
         Damoli, Surat City, Gujrat.
5.       Vikash Patil S/o Sudam Patil, 43 Bajrang Nagar Society
         Damoli, Surat City, Gujrat.
6.       Yogesh Patil S/o Bhanudas, Jalgaon Khedi Maharastra
7.       Prasant Patil S/o Bhanudas, Jalgaon Khedi Maharastra
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Oma Ram
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Narendra Singh Chandawat, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

09/04/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to have

performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was

performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

[2025:RJ-JD:18300] (2 of 2) [CRLW-960/2025]

threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are

their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned

respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with

adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so

far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed

on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners

for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide

protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 220-himanshu/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)