Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11353 Raj
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:18272]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7254/2025
1. Dileep Rao S/o Shri Girdhari Lal, Aged About 34 Years,
Resident Of Ravo Ka Bas, Village Lambiya, Anandpur Kalu
Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali.
2. Sushila Kumari, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of
Kushalpura, Reengas, Nagaur.
3. Raju Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of 30, Lav
Kush Street, Near Water Tank, Teetaradi, Udaipur.
4. Kishor Ram S/o Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 35 Years,
Resident Of 63, Bear Thakrat, Sojat Road, Ward No. 18
Bilara, Jodhpur.
5. Kanhaiya Lal S/o Shri Narayan Lal, Aged About 40 Years,
Resident Of Chamunderi Rana, Watan, Pali.
6. Radha Kishan Prajapat S/o Shri Sohan Lal Prajapat, Aged
About 41 Years, Resident Of 499, Khadgawaton Ke Mohlle
Ke Pass, City Kotawali, Bikaner.
7. Mamta Kumari Kalwaniya, Aged About 31 Years, Resident
Of Bilochi, Jaipur.
8. Vikas Chawala S/o Shri Jugal Kishor, Aged About 34
Years, Resident Of Guda Mode, Ward No. 22, Jhunjhunu.
9. Lala Ram Jat S/o Shri Ishwar Lal Jat, Aged About 41
Years, Resident Of Of Sunda Ki Dhani, Bhojpura Kalan,
Jaipur.
10. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of
Purohit Ji Ka Chowk, Gothra, Bundi.
11. Ratan Singh Panwar S/o Shri Darak Chand Panwar, Aged
About 48 Years, Resident Of Opp. New Sabji Mandi,
Sarvoday Basti, Bikaner.
12. Nirmal Singh S/o Shri Narayan Singh Rajora, Aged About
42 Years, Resident Of 07, Rajputo Ka Mohalla, Charbhuja
Nath Mandir Ke Pichhe, Surajniyas Sadas, Chittorgarh.
13. Anju Lata Jain D/o Shri Sumer Chand Jain, Aged About 44
Years, Resident Of C-601, Budh Vihar, Alwar.
14. Prakash Chand Bairwa S/o Shri Batti Lal Bairwa, Aged
About 35 Years, Residentof Village Naharsinghpura, Post
Liwali, Teh. Bamanwas, Sawai Madhopur.
15. Anuradha Sharma W/o Shri Naresh Sharma, Aged About
38 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 2518, Badariya Wali Dhani,
Machada Harmada, Jaipur.
16. Rekha Rani W/o Shri Banti, Aged About 38 Years,
Resident Of Moraka, Bharatpur.
17. Bhura Ram Rewar S/o Shri Begaram, Aged About 35
Years, Resident Of Gram Marothiya, Post Sarothiya, Tehsil
Sujangarh, Churu.
(Downloaded on 09/04/2025 at 09:52:47 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:18272] (2 of 3) [CW-7254/2025]
18. Manjeeta W/o Shri Sombeer Singh, Aged About 37 Years,
Resident Of Ward No. 4, Kandran, Tehsil Rajgarh, Churu.
19. Mansa Ram Meghwal S/o Shri Jiya Ram, Aged About 33
Years, Resident Of Ward No. 12, Near Jasanath Ji Mandir,
Lachharsar, Churu.
20. Veerendra Sharma S/o Shri Ashok Sharma, Aged About
31 Years, Resident Of Anchapura, Handiya, Dausa.
21. Supriya D/o Shri Teluram, Aged About 36 Years, Resident
Of Ward No. 06, Village Ramgadhia, Tehsil Bhadra,
Hanumangarh.
22. Jogendra Choudhary S/o Shri Mula Ram, Aged About 31
Years, Resident Of 83, Dudhva Mallinath, Panchpadra,
Barmer.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Choudhary
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Judgment
09/04/2025
1. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in
question rests covered by the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate
Bench of this Court at Jaipur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.7283/2014: Manoj Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of
Rajasthan & Ors. (decided on 16.07.2014). He submits that the
petitioners would be satisfied if the respondents are directed to
decide the representation of the petitioners in light of the
aforesaid judgment.
2. In view of the submission made, the present writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the competent
[2025:RJ-JD:18272] (3 of 3) [CW-7254/2025]
authority/respondents to decide the representation of the
petitioners if filed within a period of fifteen days from now. The
representation be decided within a period of six weeks thereafter
in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made in
the case of Manoj Khandelwal (supra).
3. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
representation has been issued only with a view to ensure
expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not
be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a
particular manner.
4. Stay petition and pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(REKHA BORANA),J 14-praveen/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!