Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gopal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:38911)
2024 Latest Caselaw 8270 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8270 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 September, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Gopal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:38911) on 20 September, 2024

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2024:RJ-JD:38911]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15379/2024

Gopal Singh S/o Late Shri Dalpat Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/
o Indra Colony, Near Railway Station, Falna, District Pali.
(Presently Working As Artisan Grade-Iii In Abu Road Depot.)
                                                                             ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
         Transport         Department,           Government             Of      Rajasthan,
         Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through The
         Chairman         And      Managing          Director,        Parivahan      Marg,
         Choumu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3.       Executive        Director       (Administration),            Rsrtc,    Parivahan
         Marg, Choumu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
4.       Chief    Manager,         Rsrtc      Abu      Road      Depot,        Abu   Road,
         Rajasthan.
                                                                        ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Avinash Acharya
For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. Shankar Singh



                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

20/09/2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a

judgment of this Court rendered in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.8810/2014 "Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road

Transport Corporation & Anr." decided on 25.01.2017 in the

following terms:-

"Apparently, by effect of the above circular, benefit of second selection scale falling due to the petitioner could

[2024:RJ-JD:38911] (2 of 3) [CW-15379/2024]

only have been deferred by two years and not more. In this background, the decision of the respondent Corporation to defer second selection scale admissible to the petitioner from 6.10.2008 to 6.10.2019 is totally unjustified, arbitrary and contrary to the circulars adopted by the Corporation. The impugned action of the respondents is thus quashed and struck down. The respondents shall extend the benefit of second selection scale to the petitioner by making a de- ferment of two years from the date of his actualentitlement. Monetary benefits flowing from the above direction shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of six months from to- day with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. In case, the payment is de- layed beyond three months, the interest shall stand en- hanced to 9% per annum and shall be recoverable from the official/s responsible for causing the delay if any.

The writ petition is allowed in these terms. No order as to costs."

3. Learned counsel further submits that the order dated

25.01.2017 was affirmed by the Division Bench in D.B. Civil

Special Appeal (Writ) No.524/2018 decided on 02.12.2021.

Against the order dated 02.12.2021 passed by the Division

Bench of this Court, a Special Leave Petition No.10330/2022

was preferred before Hon'ble the Supreme Court and

the same was also dismissed vide judgment dated

13.07.2022.

4. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the

petitioner submit that the petitioner may be permitted to

file a representation before the respondents, who shall

consider the same in light of the judgment rendered by

this Court in the case of Tara Chand (supra).

[2024:RJ-JD:38911] (3 of 3) [CW-15379/2024]

5. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for

the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a

direction that in the event of filing a representation by the

petitioners, the respondent shall decide the same within a period

of four weeks from the date of its receipt; if the case of the

petitioner falls within the purview of the law laid down by this

Court in the case of Tara Chand (supra); the same shall be

decided in terms of the judgment above.

6. Stay petition also stands disposed of.

(FARJAND ALI),J 24-Samvedana/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter