Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7028 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:28897]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 48/2023
Sheru Khan S/o Deen Mohammad, Aged About 21 Years, R/o
Nosar, Police Station Baytu, District Barmer.
(At Present Lodged In District Jail Balotra)
----Appellant
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Jasraj S/o Shri Koja Ram, R/o Shivnagar, Police Station
Sadar, District Barmer.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr.Ratna Ram,
Mr.Bhima Ram.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.Mool Singh, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
JUDGMENT
11/09/2023
The instant appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has
been filed by the appellant against the order dated 20.10.2022
passed by learned Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, Balotra in
Cr.Misc. Bail Application No.262/2022, whereby the bail application
filed by the appellant, who has been arrested in connection with
FIR No.229/2022 registered at Police Station Sadar, District
Barmer, for offences under Sections 363, 366A, 376(3), 376(2)(N)
of IPC and Sections 5(I)/6, 11(IV)/12 of POCSO Act and Sections
3(1)(w)(ii) and 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, has been rejected.
[2023:RJ-JD:28897] (2 of 3) [CRLAS-48/2023]
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the
appellant who is aged about 20 years developed consensual
sexual relationship with the prosecutrix. Drawing attention of the
Court towards the statements of the prosecutrix recorded before
competent criminal court as P.W.1, learned counsel submitted that
the prosecutrix in her statements has stated that accused-
appellant developed physical relation with her by making false
promise of marrying her. Learned counsel further submitted that
statements of the prosecutrix have already been recorded before
competent criminal court, therefore, there is no apprehension of
the appellant influencing the prosecutrix or tampering with any
material evidence.
Learned counsel submitted that the appellant is in judicial
custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time,
therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-
appellant.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail
application.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Public
Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
Having considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of the case so also the fact that the appellant who
is aged about 20 years is in judicial custody since 29.6.2022;
statements of the prosecutrix have already been recorded before
competent criminal court, therefore, there is no any apprehension
of she being influenced by the appellant, without expressing any
[2023:RJ-JD:28897] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-48/2023]
opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion
that the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
Accordingly, the appeal under Section 14A(2) of the
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)
Act is allowed. The order dated 20.10.2022 passed by learned
Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, Balotra is set aside and it is
ordered that the accused-appellant- Sheru Khan S/o Deen
Mohammad shall be enlarged on bail in connection with FIR
No.229/2022 registered at Police Station Sadar, District Barmer,
provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned
on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to so.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J /tarun goyal/
Sr.No.423
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!