Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6929 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:28305]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 736/2022
Paras Mal Meghwal S/o Pratap Ji, Aged About 51 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/o Near Vishnoi, Dharamshala, Ganda Nala, Ratanada, Jodhpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Lrs Of Akhtar Khan, Jodhpur.
3. Smt. Najmo Bano W/o Marhum Akhtar Khan, B/c Musalman, R/o Plot No. 20-D, Ramjan Ji Ka Hattha, Banar Road, Laxman Nagar, Jodhpur.
4. Adil Khan S/o Marhum Akhtar Khan, B/c Musalman, R/o Plot No. 20-D, Ramjan Ji Ka Hattha, Banar Road, Laxman Nagar, Jodhpur.
5. Samir S/o Marhum Akhtar Khan, B/c Musalman, R/o Plot No. 20-D, Ramjan Ji Ka Hattha, Banar Road, Laxman Nagar, Jodhpur.
6. Arif S/o Marhum Akhtar Khan, Minor Through Natural Guardian Smt. Rajma Bano W/o Late Shri Akhtar Khan. B/c Musalman, R/o Plot No. 20-D, Ramjan Ji Ka Hattha, Banar Road, Laxman Nagar, Jodhpur.
7. Imran S/o Marhum Akhtar Khan, Minor Through Natural Guardian Smt. Rajma Bano W/o Late Shri Akhtar Khan. B/c Musalman, R/o Plot No. 20-D, Ramjan Ji Ka Hattha, Banar Road, Laxman Nagar, Jodhpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
06/09/2023
1. The instant criminal revision petition has been preferred
against the judgment of conviction dated 14.05.2014 passed by
[2023:RJ-JD:28305] (2 of 2) [CRLR-736/2022]
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate as well against the judgment
dated 19.04.2022 passed in appeal whereby the petitioner was
convicted for offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act and this appeal
has also been dismissed.
2. Vide order dated 17.02.2023 a co-ordinate Bench of this
Court had directed the petitioner to make sure his surrender in
pursuance of the judgment dated 19.04.2022, but the needful has
not been done. This Court is in receipt of letter dated 18.03.2023
sent by Additional Chief Metro Magistrate (CBI Cases Jodhpur),
Jodhpur Metro as per which the direction of this Court has not
been complied with.
3. In this view of the matter, the instant revision petition is
dismissed. The application for suspension is sentence is also
dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move
afresh after surrender of the accused.
(FARJAND ALI),J 40-Samvedana/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!