Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kamla Purohit vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 6727 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6727 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kamla Purohit vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 2 September, 2023
Bench: Nupur Bhati

[2023:RJ-JD:27697]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6686/2020

Kamla Purohit W/o Chandra Mohan Purohit, Aged About 69 Years, R/o City Police, Kapda Bazar, Jodhpur.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education Office, Jodhpur.

4. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education Office I, Jodhpur.

5. The Secretary, Managing Committee, Bal Niketan, Jodhpur.

                                                                   ----Respondents



For Petitioner(s)            :    Mr. P.R.S. Jodha
For Respondent(s)            :    Mr. K.K. Bissa



               HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

                                       Order

02/09/2023

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue

raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by order

dated 17.11.2011 passed in Gordhan Mal Singhvi v. State of

Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B.C.W.P. No. 5118/218 and Division

Bench judgment in State of Rajasthan & Anr. v. The

Management Committee Sh. Bhagwan Das Todi College :

D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 663/2015, decided on

06.11.2015.

[2023:RJ-JD:27697] (2 of 3) [CW-6686/2020]

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State submits

that though the reply to the writ petition has been filed on behalf

of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4, which is sworn by District Education

Officer, Secondary Education Office-I, Jodhpur, the petitioner has

impleaded the Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner

and the District Education Officer, Elementary Education Office,

Jodhpur as a party respondent in the writ petition, whereas, it is

the Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner and the District

Education Officer, Secondary Education-I, Jodhpur, who are the

relevant authorities.

3. In the circumstances of the case, wherein, respondent No.

1-State has been impleaded and the response to the writ petition

on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has been filed by the District

Education Officer, Secondary Education Office-I, Jodhpur, it is

directed that instead of the Commissioner, Elementary Education,

Rajasthan, Bikaner and the District Education Officer, Elementary

Education, Jodhpur as respondent Nos. 2 and 3, the Director,

Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner and the District

Education Officer, Secondary Education, Jodhpur respectively shall

be read as respondents.

4. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner

regarding the issue being concluded by judgments in the case of

Gordhan Mal Singhvi (supra) and Bhagwan Das Todi College

(supra) are not disputed by learned counsel for the respondents.

5. In view of the above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner

is allowed in light of and with the similar directions as in the case

of the above judgments in the following terms:-

[2023:RJ-JD:27697] (3 of 3) [CW-6686/2020]

"(1) Within 60 days from today, the respondent No.3 shall make payment of the amount to the petitioner towards arrears of salary as a result of fixation under the grades under the Revised Pay Scales Rules; towards selection grades upon completion of 9,18 and 27 years of service; towards leave encashment; and towards gratuity and provident fund alongwith interst @ 12% per annum from23.07.2008 until the date of payment.(2) The respondents Nos.1 and 2 shall grant approval and release the grant-in-aid within 60 days from the date of the respondent No.3 submitting in its claim in accordance with the provisions of the Rules of 1993 and the applicable decisions."

6. Further, the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and 5 are also directed to

comply with the direction as given/observations made in the case

of Bhagwan Das Todi College (supra), wherein, inter alia, the

following directions have been given regarding payment:-

"The Special Appeals filed by the State Government are without substance and accordingly dismissed and taking note of the Sec.31(2) of the Act, 1989 we direct the Non- Government Educational Institutions to prepare due drawn statement of each of the employees of their Institution who have worked against sanctioned & aided posts in regard to their arrears of salary and other dues which are approved expenditure to the extent of grant-in-aid and the same be sent to the State Government and the State Government after its due verification from their records will make payment of arrears to each of the employee who either have now become members of Rules, 2010 or have retired or left the job (up to the period one has worked) and to other employees similarly situated under intimation to the concerned Non-Government Recognized Institution."

7. In the circumstances of the case needful may be done within

a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy

of this order.

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J

87-/Devesh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter