Ramchandra Singh S/O Shri ... vs Rajhans Upadhyaya ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 4774 Raj/2

[2023:RJ-JP:22245]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 108/2019

                                              In

                     S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8746/2018

1.       Ramchandra Singh S/o Shri Pannaram, Aged About 61
         Years,      R/o      Shastri      Nagar,       Post     Jhingar    Chooti   Via
         Katrathal Tehsil Dhond, District Sikar (Raj)
2.       Bhagwan Singh S/o Shri Danaram, Aged About 62 Years,
         R/o Kolida, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.)
3.       Jhabarmal S/o Shri Jhutha Ram, R/o Village Khojawas,
         Post Barwa, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
4.       Madan Lal S/o Shri Goruram, R/o Village Ajitpura, Post
         Kudan Tehsil Dhond District Sikar (Raj.)
5.       Gomaram S/o Shri Begaram, R/o Village Sihot Chhoti Via
         Phagalwa, Tehsil Dhond, District Sikar (Raj.)
6.       Madan Lal Singodiya S/o Shri Sitaram, Aged About 64
         Years, R/o Out Of Chandpole Gate, Jaton Ka Chowk, Ward
         No. 20, Sikar (Raj.)
7.       Gopal Ram Dhaka S/o Shri Medharam, Aged About 62
         Years,      R/o      Village      Khatipura,          Post    Jasrasar,   Tehsil
         Laxmangarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
8.       Deen Dayal Jangid S/o Shri Ganpatram, Aged About 61
         Years, R/o Village Savloda Ghaylan Tehsil Dhond, District
         Sikar (Raj.)
9.       Kailash Chand Verma S/o Shri Satyanarayan Verma, Aged
         About 64 Years, R/o Village Bihari Marg, Bhartiyon Ka
         Mohalla, Ward No. 17, Sikar , District Sikar (Raj.)
10.      Bhinvaram Rathi S/o Shri Manaram, Aged About 63 Years,
         R/o Village Palwas, Tehsil Dhond, District Sikar (Raj.)
11.      Deep Chand Yadav S/o Shri Parsaram, Aged About 62
         Years, R/o Village Maksudpura, Post Sujawas Via Randoli,
         Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.0
12.      Jagdish Prasad S/o Shri Lichhmanram, Aged About 61
         Years, R/o Village Gudakhurd, Palsana, District Sikar
         (Raj.)
13.      Banwari Lal Pilaniya S/o Shri Begaram, Aged About 62
         Years, R/o Village Ajitpura, Post Kudan, Tehsil Dhond


                           (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:56:42 PM)
 [2023:RJ-JP:22245]                   (2 of 3)                        [CCP-108/2019]


         District Sikar (Raj.)
14.      Surajbhan Singh S/o Shri Jamnaram, Aged About 62
         Years, R/o Village And Post Khora Via Bay, Tehsil
         Danrtaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       Rajhans Upadhyaya, Managing Director, Rajasthan State
         Road Transport Corporation Parivahan Marg, Chomu
         House, Jaipur (Raj.)
2.       Gopal Vijay, Financial Advisor, Rajasthan State Road
         Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House,
         Jaipur
3.       Meghraj Singh Ratnu, Excutive Director, Rajasthan State
         Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu
         House, Jaipur
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Om Prakash Sheoran

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Judgment / Order

12/09/2023

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that barring the

interest component/allowances, they have been paid all of their

dues.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the

petitioners shall be paid interest/allowances as per their priority in

view of Circulars of the RSRTC dated 03.11.2021 & 17.05.2022.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection if the

payment of interest/allowances is made to them as per their

priority in view of the aforesaid Circulars.

[2023:RJ-JP:22245] (3 of 3) [CCP-108/2019]

In view thereof, this contempt petition is disposed of.

However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to get the contempt

petition revived if the priority is breached by the respondents.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

Sudha/27

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)