Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4506 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:20595]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1915/2023
1. Navita D/o Manohar Lal Verma, W/o Sh.
Ranjeet Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
Kumharon Ka Mohalla, Bagor District
Jhunjhunu. At Present R/o Ward No. 03,
Doomoli Khurd District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
2. Ranjeet Singh S/o Sh. Naresh Kumar, Aged
About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Doomoli
Khurd District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary,
Department Of Home Affairs Govt. Secretariat
Jaipur.
2. Director General Of Police, Police Head
Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu District
Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
4. Superintendent Of Police, Neem Ka Thana
District Neem Ka Thana (Raj.)
5. The Station House Officer Police Station,
Singhana, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
6. The Station House Officer Police Station,
Khetri, District Neem Ka Thana (Rajasthan).
7. Manohar Lal Verma S/o Sh. Moolchand
Kumawat, R/o Kumharon Ka Mohalla, Bagor
District Jhunjhunu.
8. Lalita Devi W/o Sh. Manohar Lal Verma, R/o
Kumharon Ka Mohalla, Bagor District
Jhunjhunu.
9. Mukesh S/o Sh. Dharmpal, R/o Badangarh,
Tehsil Chidawa District Jhunjhunu.
10. Pooja Devi W/o Sh. Vikram Nanwal, R/o
(Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:52 PM)
[2023:RJ-JP:20595] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1915/2023]
Budhana District Jhunjhunu.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anzum Parveen, Adv., for Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar, Adv.
For : Mr. Yashwant Kankhediya, P.P. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
02/09/2023
The petitioners have preferred the present writ
petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
for issuance of necessary directions to the
respondent authorities to provide adequate security
and protection to them, as they are facing grave
threat of life and liberty at the hands of private
respondent(s).
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the petitioners are of major age and they solemnized
their marriage of their own free will. However, their
family members are not agreeable to their marriage
and have threatened them of dire consequences.
She prays that adequate police protection be
provided to them.
Though no specific instance or imminent threat
has been pleaded but considering the submissions
made by learned counsel for the petitioners and
[2023:RJ-JP:20595] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1915/2023]
having regard to the facts and circumstances of the
case, this Court is of the opinion that if the
petitioners are having any apprehension or threat
perception about their life and liberty from their
relatives, they may move appropriate representation
before the Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) indicating their
concern with the name(s) of probable assailants.
If any such representation is moved by the
petitioners, the Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu
District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) shall consider the
same and after analysing the factual situation pass
necessary orders or take action to ward off any
untoward incident.
It is hereby clarified that this order may not be
construed to be a validation of petitioners' marriage
and proof of their age. Any observation made herein
shall not affect any criminal or civil proceedings
initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of
their relatives.
With these observations, this criminal writ
petition is disposed of.
The stay application also stands disposed of
accordingly.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /556
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!