Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Navita D/O Manohar Lal Verma, W/O ... vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 4506 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4506 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Navita D/O Manohar Lal Verma, W/O ... vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 2 September, 2023
Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas
[2023:RJ-JP:20595]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
            BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1915/2023

1.     Navita D/o Manohar Lal Verma, W/o Sh.
       Ranjeet Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
       Kumharon           Ka       Mohalla,         Bagor          District
       Jhunjhunu. At Present R/o Ward No. 03,
       Doomoli Khurd District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
2.     Ranjeet Singh S/o Sh. Naresh Kumar, Aged
       About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Doomoli
       Khurd District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
                                                         ----Petitioners
                                Versus
1.     State      Of     Rajasthan,         Through          Secretary,
       Department Of Home Affairs Govt. Secretariat
       Jaipur.
2.     Director        General      Of     Police,        Police     Head
       Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.
3.     Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu District
       Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
4.     Superintendent Of Police, Neem Ka Thana
       District Neem Ka Thana (Raj.)
5.     The Station House Officer Police Station,
       Singhana, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
6.     The Station House Officer Police Station,
       Khetri, District Neem Ka Thana (Rajasthan).
7.     Manohar         Lal     Verma       S/o     Sh.      Moolchand
       Kumawat, R/o Kumharon Ka Mohalla, Bagor
       District Jhunjhunu.
8.     Lalita Devi W/o Sh. Manohar Lal Verma, R/o
       Kumharon           Ka       Mohalla,         Bagor          District
       Jhunjhunu.
9.     Mukesh S/o Sh. Dharmpal, R/o Badangarh,
       Tehsil Chidawa District Jhunjhunu.
10.    Pooja Devi W/o Sh. Vikram Nanwal, R/o



             (Downloaded on 11/11/2023 at 07:44:52 PM)
 [2023:RJ-JP:20595]              (2 of 3)                 [CRLW-1915/2023]


       Budhana District Jhunjhunu.
                                                   ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anzum Parveen, Adv., for Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar, Adv.

For : Mr. Yashwant Kankhediya, P.P. Respondent(s)

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

02/09/2023

The petitioners have preferred the present writ

petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

for issuance of necessary directions to the

respondent authorities to provide adequate security

and protection to them, as they are facing grave

threat of life and liberty at the hands of private

respondent(s).

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

the petitioners are of major age and they solemnized

their marriage of their own free will. However, their

family members are not agreeable to their marriage

and have threatened them of dire consequences.

She prays that adequate police protection be

provided to them.

Though no specific instance or imminent threat

has been pleaded but considering the submissions

made by learned counsel for the petitioners and

[2023:RJ-JP:20595] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1915/2023]

having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

case, this Court is of the opinion that if the

petitioners are having any apprehension or threat

perception about their life and liberty from their

relatives, they may move appropriate representation

before the Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu

District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) indicating their

concern with the name(s) of probable assailants.

If any such representation is moved by the

petitioners, the Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu

District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) shall consider the

same and after analysing the factual situation pass

necessary orders or take action to ward off any

untoward incident.

It is hereby clarified that this order may not be

construed to be a validation of petitioners' marriage

and proof of their age. Any observation made herein

shall not affect any criminal or civil proceedings

initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of

their relatives.

With these observations, this criminal writ

petition is disposed of.

The stay application also stands disposed of

accordingly.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DANISH USMANI /556

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter