Tuesday, 19, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prem Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:39929)
2023 Latest Caselaw 9942 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9942 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Prem Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:39929) on 21 November, 2023

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

[2023:RJ-JD:39929]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
     S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Suspension Of Sentence Application
                       (Appeal) No. 1359/2023

Prem Kumar S/o Shri Triloka Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Kansar Ps Khuiya Dist. Hanumangarh Raj. At Present Lodged In
Dist. Jail Hanumangarh
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Kuldeep Sharma.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Arun Kumar, PP.



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

21/11/2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner in the garb of

tuition entered into relationship with the prosecutrix and while

impacting her with intoxicants forcibly made relationship with her

and also made videos with her. The prosecutrix got pregnant in

February, 2016 and when she was given abortion medicine the

offence was disclosed, when the prosecutrix fell ill, thereafter, also

the same allegation was repeatedly continued for two and a half

years as per the complaint. Finally, the FIR for the incident of pre

February, 2016 was lodged on 21.10.2018.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that first

criminal misc. suspension of sentence application (appeal) bearing

[2023:RJ-JD:39929] (2 of 3) [SOSA-1359/2023]

No.864/2021 was dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file

fresh after the completion of 5 years of custody.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that custody

certificate dated 07.11.2023, as per which, the custody of 5 years

2 months and 23 days has been undergone.

5. Looking into the peculiar factual matrix as well as the fact

that the petitioner has undergone the prolonged custody of 5

years and the appeal is not likely to be heard soon, is inclined to

suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the accused

applicant-appellant.

6. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case and on conjoint consideration of the submissions made

by learned counsel for the appellant, this Court considers it just

and proper to suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the

accused applicant-appellant.

7. Accordingly, the present second suspension of sentence

application filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered

that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court vide

judgment dated 18.11.2021 in Sessions Case No.01/2019 (CIS

No.01/2019) against applicant-appellant Prem Kumar S/o Shri

Triloka Ram shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned Trial Judge/ Link Court for his

appearance in this court on 22.12.2023 and whenever ordered to

do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated

below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the

[2023:RJ-JD:39929] (3 of 3) [SOSA-1359/2023]

month of January of every year till the appeal is

decided.

2. That if the appellant changes the place of

residence, he will give in writing his changed

address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

they will give in writing their changed address to

the trial Court.

8. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

110-/Jitender//-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter