Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9938 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:39820]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16812/2023
1. Chandra Prakash Gour S/o Shri Shyamkaran Gour, Aged
About 64 Years, R/o Mohalla Lal Ji Ki Baori, Tehsil
Didwana, Dist. Didwana, Kuchaman.
2. Nathuram Dhaka S/o Girdhari Ram, Aged About 64 Years,
R/o Kerap, Tehsil Didwana, Dist. Didwana, Kuchaman.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance,
Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. The Commissioner, College Education, Government Of
Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Rajasthan
Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Ojha
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pradhuman Singh Rajpurohit for
Mr. Himanshu Shrimali, AGC
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
21/11/2023
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a
judgment dated 21.07.2023 of this Court at Jaipur Bench rendered
in batch of writ petition led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.21/2020 (Vijay Singh vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.). The
operative part of the said order reproduced as under :-
"41. Hence, looking to the binding effect of above judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of C.P.
[2023:RJ-JD:39820] (2 of 2) [CW-16812/2023]
Mundinamani(supra) and All India Judges Association (supra), it is held that the petitioners would be entitled to get the benefits of increment falling due on 1st July on account of their conduct for the requisite length of time i.e. one year. The petitioners would be entitled to get notional payment on 1 st July, notwithstanding their superannuation on 30th June.
42. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners afresh in the light of the observations made hereinabove and thereafter grant notional increment to the petitioners. The petitioners' pension would consequently be refixed. The appropriate orders be issued and the arrears of pension be paid to the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
43. With the aforesaid directions, all these petitions stand disposed of.
44. Stay applications and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of".
2. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioners may
be permitted to file a detailed representation before the
competent authorities for redressal of their grievances.
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed
with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation to the
competent authorities of the department and the competent
authorities of the department are directed to decide the same
within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such
representation, keeping in mind the law laid down by this Court in
the case of Vijay Singh (supra).
4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made
in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the
veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,
the averments made therein are found to be correct, the
petitioners would be entitled to the relief. All pending applications
also stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
19-Zeeshan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!