Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandra Prakash Gour vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:39820)
2023 Latest Caselaw 9938 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9938 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Chandra Prakash Gour vs State Of Rajasthan (2023:Rj-Jd:39820) on 21 November, 2023

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

[2023:RJ-JD:39820]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16812/2023

1.       Chandra Prakash Gour S/o Shri Shyamkaran Gour, Aged
         About 64 Years, R/o Mohalla Lal Ji Ki Baori, Tehsil
         Didwana, Dist. Didwana, Kuchaman.
2.       Nathuram Dhaka S/o Girdhari Ram, Aged About 64 Years,
         R/o Kerap, Tehsil Didwana, Dist. Didwana, Kuchaman.
                                                                       ----Petitioners
                                         Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
         Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       The     Principal         Secretary,      Department           Of    Finance,
         Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3.       The Commissioner, College Education, Government Of
         Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4.       The Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Rajasthan
         Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.
                                                                     ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Dinesh Kumar Ojha
For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. Pradhuman Singh Rajpurohit for
                                     Mr. Himanshu Shrimali, AGC



      HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

21/11/2023

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a

judgment dated 21.07.2023 of this Court at Jaipur Bench rendered

in batch of writ petition led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.21/2020 (Vijay Singh vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.). The

operative part of the said order reproduced as under :-

"41. Hence, looking to the binding effect of above judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of C.P.

[2023:RJ-JD:39820] (2 of 2) [CW-16812/2023]

Mundinamani(supra) and All India Judges Association (supra), it is held that the petitioners would be entitled to get the benefits of increment falling due on 1st July on account of their conduct for the requisite length of time i.e. one year. The petitioners would be entitled to get notional payment on 1 st July, notwithstanding their superannuation on 30th June.

42. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioners afresh in the light of the observations made hereinabove and thereafter grant notional increment to the petitioners. The petitioners' pension would consequently be refixed. The appropriate orders be issued and the arrears of pension be paid to the petitioners within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

43. With the aforesaid directions, all these petitions stand disposed of.

44. Stay applications and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of".

2. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioners may

be permitted to file a detailed representation before the

competent authorities for redressal of their grievances.

3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed

with liberty to the petitioners to file a representation to the

competent authorities of the department and the competent

authorities of the department are directed to decide the same

within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such

representation, keeping in mind the law laid down by this Court in

the case of Vijay Singh (supra).

4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners would be entitled to the relief. All pending applications

also stand disposed of.

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

19-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter