Suresh Kumar Meena vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 9859 Raj

[2023:RJ-JD:39680]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18162/2023

1. Suresh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Tundu Ram Meena, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Bonl, District Karauli.

2. Naimy Chand Meena S/o Shri Sukh Chand Meena, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Jagjiwanpur, District Bharatpur.

3. Radheyshyam Meena S/o Shri Devchand Meena, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Ghatwasan Mandir Ke Pas, Via - Sri Mahaveer Ji, Shekh Pura, District Karauli.

4. Bajrang Lal S/o Maru Ram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village And Post Dada Fatehpura, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

5. Vinod Kumar Meena S/o Ganga Ram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village And Post Toda Nagar, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Alwar.

6. Jai Singh Yadav S/o Prabhudayal Yadav, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village And Post Dada Fatehpura, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

7. Sumitra D/o Lal Chand, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village And Post Dada Fatehpura, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

8. Saroj Deri Sharma D/o Dana Ram Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village And Post Dada Fatehpura, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

9. Laxman Ram S/o Jhabar Mal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village And Post Dada Fatehpura, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

10. Prahlad Meena S/o Gangadhar Meena, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village And Post Daulatpura, Tehsil Lalsot, Dausa.

11. Smt. Sunita Saini D/o Banwari Lal Saini, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village And Post Chandmari Road, Ward No. 1, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

12. Om Prakash Gurjar S/o Bhagwan Ram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village And Post Bansiyal, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

13. Balwan Singh S/o Manohar Singh, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village And Post Ranwa, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

[2023:RJ-JD:39680] (2 of 4) [CW-18162/2023]

14. Fakir Chand S/o Jeewan Ram, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village And Post Shimla, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

15. Suman Verma W/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village And Post Dada Fatehpura, Tehsil Khetri, Jhunjhunu.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Primary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Elementary And Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner.

3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Jodhpur.

4. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Alwar.

5. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Jhunjhunu.

6. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Rajsamand.

7. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Barmer.

                                                                      ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Sushil Solanki
For Respondent(s)              :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

20/11/2023

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the

identical situation this court vide order dated 25.04.2023 has

[2023:RJ-JD:39680] (3 of 4) [CW-18162/2023]

disposed of S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.6580/2020 (Jugal Kishore &

Ors. V/s State & Ors.) in the following terms:-

"1. While inviting court's attention to the prayer in the writ petition, vis-a-vis, the order dated 28.05.2021 passed by the State Government, Mr. Chanda learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the relief claimed in the writ petitions has already been granted to the petitioners and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

2. In view of the submissions notices above and considering the order dated 28.05.2021, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

3. Since, it is admitted case of the State that petitioners' grievance has been redressed, it will be incumbent upon the competent authority to pass an order in terms of the order dated 28.05.2021.

4. In view of the fact that the State Government had taken an in- principle decision to redress petitioners' grievance way back on 28.05.2021, the competent authority of the respondent- State is hereby directed to pass an appropriate order revising petitioners' pay scale in terms of the order dated 28.05.2021 and determine the salary payable as early as possible preferably within three months from today.

5. After re-fixation of petitioner's pay scale, the respondents shall pay the arrears to the petitioners latest by 31.12.2023.

6. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly".

In view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioners

submits that the petitioners may be permitted to submit a detailed

representation to the respondents and prays that the respondents

may be directed to consider the same in the light of judgment

rendered by this court in the case of Jugal Kishore & Ors (supra).

Considering the limited prayer made by the counsel for the

petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms that in

the event of filing a representation by the petitioners, the same

shall be considered and decided by the respondents in the light of

judgment rendered by this court in case of Jugal Kishore (supra)

[2023:RJ-JD:39680] (4 of 4) [CW-18162/2023]

within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified

copy of this order.

The present order has been passed on the submission made

by the counsel for the petitioners that the case of the petitioners is

similar to the case of Jugal Kishore, therefore, if the facts of the

present case are not similar to the case of Jugal Kishore, the

respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the

submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments

made therein are found to be correct, the petitioners would be

entitled to the relief.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 77-divya/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)