Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9850 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2023
[2023:RJ-JD:39425-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5080/2014
U.I.T., Bhilwara
----Petitioner Versus Union Of India And Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Judgment / Order
17/11/2023
1. In the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged the
action of the Assessing Officer of initiating proceedings against the
petitioners-Urban Improvement Trusts/Development Authorities
for assessment of the tax under the provisions of Income Tax Act,
1961 (for short "the Act of 1961").
2. Precisely, the legality of the proceedings is challenged on the
ground that the petitioner being local authority within the meaning
of Section 10 (20) of the Act of 1961, its income is not assessable
to tax and therefore, the proceedings initiated are without
jurisdiction. It is submitted that the term 'District Board/Municipal
Committee' used in clause 3 of Explanation to Section 10(20) of
the Act of 1961 in the context it is used include in its meaning
Urban Improvement Trust/Development Authority as it is legally
entitled and entrusted by the State Government with the control
or management of local fund.
[2023:RJ-JD:39425-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-5080/2014]
3. The question involved in the present writ petition is no more
res-integra, inasmuch as in the matter of "Income Tax Officer &
Ors. vs. Urban Improvement Trust & Ors.", AIR 2018 SC
5085, the Hon'ble Supreme Court while setting aside a Bench
decision of this Court deciding the issue in favour of the assessee-
Urban Improvement Trust, has categorically held that the Urban
Improvement Trust constituted and established under Rajasthan
Urban Improvement Act, 1959 does not fall within the definition of
'local authority' within the meaning of clause 3 of Explanation to
Section 10 (20) of the Act of 1961.
4. The legal position settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as
aforesaid is not disputed by the counsel appearing for the
petitioners.
5. In this view of the matter, this writ petition is liable to be
dismissed in light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Urban Improvement Trust's case (supra).
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in light of decision
of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Urban Improvement Trust's case
(supra). The interim order passed in this matter by this Court shall
stand vacated. No order as to costs.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (VIJAY BISHNOI),J
21 - ms rathore
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!