Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Laxmi vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 8985 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8985 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Laxmi vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 2 November, 2023
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur

[2023:RJ-JD:37526]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1875/2023

1. Laxmi D/o Boduram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No.11, Basawa, Dist. Jhunjhunu At Present Residing At Ward No.05, Mukta Prasad Colony, Bikaner

2. Jitendra Kumar S/o Raghuveer Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bugala, Dist. Jhunjhunu At Present R/o Ward No.05, Mukta Prasad Colony, Bikaner

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur

2. Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu

3. Superintendent Of Police, Bikaner

4. Sho, Kotwali Bikaner, P.s.,dist. Bikaner

5. Boduram S/o Rameshwar Lal, R/o Ward No. 11, Basawa, Dist. Jhunjhunu

6. Sandeep S/o Boduram, R/o Ward No. 11, Basawa, Dist.

Jhunjhunu

7. Sunil S/o Boduram, R/o Ward No. 11, Basawa, Dist.

Jhunjhunu

8. Ankit S/o Devraj, R/o Ward No. 11, Basawa, Dist.

Jhunjhunu

9. Anil S/o Surendra, R/o Khojawas, Tehsil Nawalgarh, Dist.

Jhunjhunu

10. Nekiram S/o Nagaramal, R/o Devganv, Tehsil Nawalgarh, Dist. Jhunjhunu

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

02/11/2023

The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

[2023:RJ-JD:37526] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1875/2023]

The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live

in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other

against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at

the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The

petitioners allegedly approached the Superintendent of Police,

Bikaner with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection but

no heed has been paid to their request so far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in

relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the

judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the

prayer made by the petitioners for directing the S.P., Bikaner to

provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The Superintendent of Police, Bikaner shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The S.P.

Bikaner shall ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners,

who are in a live in relationship.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

A copy of this order be sent to the respondents forthwith.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 3-prashant/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter