Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2166 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2023
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 246/2023 Darshan Singh
----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Singh, Present-in-
Person For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order
13/03/2023
The defect has been pointed out by the Registry. As the
certified copies of judgment of trial Court and Court of appeal are
not annexed with the revision petition. By way of the judgment
impugned, the learned appellate Court had decided the appeal of
the accused persons Vijay and Madan Lal by the same order with
which the appeal of the appellant petitioner was decided. The
revision petition preferred on behalf of the accused persons Vijay
and Madan Lal has been registered before this Court and their
sentence has been suspended. The certified copies are already
taken with the files of Vijay and Madan Lal.
In this view of the matter, the want of certified copies of
judgment impugned is dispensed with and thus, the defect is
overruled.
Heard.
Admit.
Issue notice. Call for record.
(FARJAND ALI),J 171-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!